Accuracy of manual and automatic placement of an anatomical coordinate system for the full or partial radius in 3D space

Abstract

AbstractAccurate placement of a coordinate system on the radius is important to quantitatively report 3D surgical planning parameters or joint kinematics using 4D imaging techniques. In clinical practice, the scanned length of the radial shaft varies among scanning protocols and scientific studies. The error in positioning a radial coordinate system using a partially scanned radius is unknown. This study investigates whether the imaged length of the radius significantly affects the positioning of the coordinate system. For different lengths of the radius, the error of positioning a coordinate system was determined when placed automatically or manually. A total of 85 healthy radii were systematically shortened until 10% of the distal radius remained. Coordinate systems were placed automatically and manually at each shortening step. A linear mixed model was used to associate the positioning error with the length of the radial shaft. The accuracy and precision of radial coordinate system placement were compared between automatic and manual placement. For automatic placement of the radial coordinate system, an increasing positioning error was associated with an increased shortening of the radius (P = < 0.001). Automatic placement is superior to manual placement; however, if less than 20% of the radial shaft length remains, manual placement is more accurate.