Author:
Feiveson Alan,George Kerry,Shavers Mark,Moreno-Villanueva Maria,Zhang Ye,Babiak-Vazquez Adriana,Crucian Brian,Semones Edward,Wu Honglu
Abstract
AbstractSpace radiation consists of energetic protons and other heavier ions. During the International Space Station program, chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of astronauts have been analyzed to estimate received biological doses of space radiation. More specifically, pre-flight blood samples were exposed ex vivo to varying doses of gamma rays, while post-flight blood samples were collected shortly and several months after landing. Here, in a study of 43 crew-missions, we investigated whether individual radiosensitivity, as determined by the ex vivo dose–response of the pre-flight chromosome aberration rate (CAR), contributes to the prediction of the post-flight CAR incurred from the radiation exposure during missions. Random-effects Poisson regression was used to estimate subject-specific radiosensitivities from the preflight dose–response data, which were in turn used to predict post-flight CAR and subject-specific relative biological effectiveness (RBEs) between space radiation and gamma radiation. Covariates age, gender were also considered. Results indicate that there is predictive value in background CAR as well as radiosensitivity determined preflight for explaining individual differences in post-flight CAR over and above that which could be explained by BFO dose alone. The in vivo RBE for space radiation was estimated to be approximately 3 relative to the ex vivo dose response to gamma irradiation. In addition, pre-flight radiosensitivity tended to be higher for individuals having a higher background CAR, suggesting that individuals with greater radiosensitivity can be more sensitive to other environmental stressors encountered in daily life. We also noted that both background CAR and radiosensitivity tend to increase with age, although both are highly variable. Finally, we observed no significant difference between the observed CAR shortly after mission and at > 6 months post-mission.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Guidance on Radiation Received in Space Activities. NCRP Report No.98 (Bethesda, MD, 1989).
2. Fry, R. J. Approaches to radiation guidelines for space travel. Adv. Space Res. 4, 121–130 (1984).
3. Durante, M. & Cucinotta, F. A. Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2391 (2008).
4. Chancellor, J. C. et al. Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts. NPJ. Microgravity 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-018-0043-2 (2018).
5. Moreno-Villanueva, M. W., H. Radiation and microgravity—associated stress factors and carcinogenesis. REACH—Rev. Hum. Space Explor. 13, 100027 (2019).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献