Author:
Shibuki Taro,Otsuka Taiga,Shimokawa Mototsugu,Nakazawa Junichi,Arima Shiho,Fukahori Masaru,Miwa Keisuke,Okabe Yoshinobu,Koga Futa,Ueda Yujiro,Kubotsu Yoshihito,Makiyama Akitaka,Shimokawa Hozumi,Takeshita Shigeyuki,Nishikawa Kazuo,Komori Azusa,Otsu Satoshi,Hosokawa Ayumu,Sakai Tatsunori,Oda Hisanobu,Kawahira Machiko,Arita Shuji,Honda Takuya,Taguchi Hiroki,Tsuneyoshi Kengo,Kawaguchi Yasunori,Fujita Toshihiro,Sakae Takahiro,Nio Kenta,Ide Yasushi,Ureshino Norio,Shirakawa Tsuyoshi,Mizuta Toshihiko,Mitsugi Kenji
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab–paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC