Prediction of blood pressure changes during surgical incision using the minimum evoked current of vascular stiffness value under sevoflurane anesthesia

Author:

Shorin Daiki,Kamiya Satoshi,Nakamura Ryuji,Ishibashi Ayaka,Saeki Noboru,Tsuji Toshio,Tsutsumi Yasuo M.

Abstract

AbstractNecessary and sufficient opioids should be administered for safe and stable anesthesia. However, opioid sensitivity varies among individuals. We previously reported that sympathetic responses to nociceptive stimuli under propofol anesthesia could be predicted by measuring the minimum evoked current of the vascular stiffness value (MECK). However, this result has only been proven under propofol anesthesia. We propose that MECK could be used under anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic. Thirty patients undergoing laparotomy with sevoflurane anesthesia received 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane and intravenous remifentanil at a constant concentration of 2 ng/mL, followed by tetanic stimulation, to measure MECK. After tetanic stimulation, the same anesthetic conditions were maintained, and the rate of change in systolic blood pressure (ROCBP) during the skin incision was measured. The correlation coefficient between the MECK and ROCBP during skin incision under sevoflurane anesthesia was R =  − 0.735 (P < 0.01), similar to that in a previous study with propofol (R =  − 0.723). Thus, a high correlation was observed. The slope of the linear regression equation was − 0.27, similar to that obtained in the study on propofol (− 0.28). These results suggest that, as with propofol anesthesia, MECK can be used as a predictive index for ROCBP under 0.7 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia.Clinical trial registration: Registry, University hospital Medical Information Network; registration number, UMIN000047425; principal investigator’s name, Noboru Saeki; date of registration, April 8, 2022.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference33 articles.

1. Yamamoto, T. & Schindler, E. Short title: Anaesthetic mechanisms in the CNS, Where and how do anaesthetics act?. Mec. Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 49, 288–293 (2017).

2. Mencke, T., Schmartz, D. & Fuchs-Buder, T. Neuromuskuläres monitoring. Anaesthesist 62, 847–861 (2013).

3. Hight, D. et al. Five commercial ‘depth of anaesthesia’ monitors provide discordant clinical recommendations in response to identical emergence-like EEG signals. Br. J. Anaesth. 23, 00026 (2023).

4. Nitzschke, R., Fischer, M. & Funcke, S. Nociception monitoring: Method for intraoperative opioid control?. Anaesthesist 70, 735–752 (2021).

5. Funcke, S. et al. Guiding opioid administration by 3 different analgesia nociception monitoring indices during general anesthesia alters intraoperative sufentanil consumption and stress hormone release: A randomized controlled pilot study. Anesth. Analg. 130, 1264–1273 (2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3