Author:
Shorin Daiki,Kamiya Satoshi,Nakamura Ryuji,Ishibashi Ayaka,Saeki Noboru,Tsuji Toshio,Tsutsumi Yasuo M.
Abstract
AbstractNecessary and sufficient opioids should be administered for safe and stable anesthesia. However, opioid sensitivity varies among individuals. We previously reported that sympathetic responses to nociceptive stimuli under propofol anesthesia could be predicted by measuring the minimum evoked current of the vascular stiffness value (MECK). However, this result has only been proven under propofol anesthesia. We propose that MECK could be used under anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic. Thirty patients undergoing laparotomy with sevoflurane anesthesia received 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane and intravenous remifentanil at a constant concentration of 2 ng/mL, followed by tetanic stimulation, to measure MECK. After tetanic stimulation, the same anesthetic conditions were maintained, and the rate of change in systolic blood pressure (ROCBP) during the skin incision was measured. The correlation coefficient between the MECK and ROCBP during skin incision under sevoflurane anesthesia was R = − 0.735 (P < 0.01), similar to that in a previous study with propofol (R = − 0.723). Thus, a high correlation was observed. The slope of the linear regression equation was − 0.27, similar to that obtained in the study on propofol (− 0.28). These results suggest that, as with propofol anesthesia, MECK can be used as a predictive index for ROCBP under 0.7 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia.Clinical trial registration: Registry, University hospital Medical Information Network; registration number, UMIN000047425; principal investigator’s name, Noboru Saeki; date of registration, April 8, 2022.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Yamamoto, T. & Schindler, E. Short title: Anaesthetic mechanisms in the CNS, Where and how do anaesthetics act?. Mec. Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 49, 288–293 (2017).
2. Mencke, T., Schmartz, D. & Fuchs-Buder, T. Neuromuskuläres monitoring. Anaesthesist 62, 847–861 (2013).
3. Hight, D. et al. Five commercial ‘depth of anaesthesia’ monitors provide discordant clinical recommendations in response to identical emergence-like EEG signals. Br. J. Anaesth. 23, 00026 (2023).
4. Nitzschke, R., Fischer, M. & Funcke, S. Nociception monitoring: Method for intraoperative opioid control?. Anaesthesist 70, 735–752 (2021).
5. Funcke, S. et al. Guiding opioid administration by 3 different analgesia nociception monitoring indices during general anesthesia alters intraoperative sufentanil consumption and stress hormone release: A randomized controlled pilot study. Anesth. Analg. 130, 1264–1273 (2020).