Author:
Zona Donatella,Lafleur Peter M.,Hufkens Koen,Bailey Barbara,Gioli Beniamino,Burba George,Goodrich Jordan P.,Liljedahl Anna K.,Euskirchen Eugénie S.,Watts Jennifer D.,Farina Mary,Kimball John S.,Heimann Martin,Göckede Mathias,Pallandt Martijn,Christensen Torben R.,Mastepanov Mikhail,López-Blanco Efrén,Jackowicz-Korczynski Marcin,Dolman Albertus J.,Marchesini Luca Belelli,Commane Roisin,Wofsy Steven C.,Miller Charles E.,Lipson David A.,Hashemi Josh,Arndt Kyle A.,Kutzbach Lars,Holl David,Boike Julia,Wille Christian,Sachs Torsten,Kalhori Aram,Song Xia,Xu Xiaofeng,Humphreys Elyn R.,Koven Charles D.,Sonnentag Oliver,Meyer Gesa,Gosselin Gabriel H.,Marsh Philip,Oechel Walter C.
Abstract
AbstractArctic warming is affecting snow cover and soil hydrology, with consequences for carbon sequestration in tundra ecosystems. The scarcity of observations in the Arctic has limited our understanding of the impact of covarying environmental drivers on the carbon balance of tundra ecosystems. In this study, we address some of these uncertainties through a novel record of 119 site-years of summer data from eddy covariance towers representing dominant tundra vegetation types located on continuous permafrost in the Arctic. Here we found that earlier snowmelt was associated with more tundra net CO2 sequestration and higher gross primary productivity (GPP) only in June and July, but with lower net carbon sequestration and lower GPP in August. Although higher evapotranspiration (ET) can result in soil drying with the progression of the summer, we did not find significantly lower soil moisture with earlier snowmelt, nor evidence that water stress affected GPP in the late growing season. Our results suggest that the expected increased CO2 sequestration arising from Arctic warming and the associated increase in growing season length may not materialize if tundra ecosystems are not able to continue sequestering CO2 later in the season.
Funder
National Science Foundation
NASA ABoVE
European Union’s Horizon 2020 INTAROS
Natural Environment Research Council
NOAA Center for Earth System Sciences and Remote Sensing Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Overland, J. E., et al. The NOAA Arctic Report Card, Surface Air Temperature. https://arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card/Report-Card2019/ArtMID/7916/ArticleID/835/Surface-Air-Temperature. (2019).
2. Liljedahl, A. K. et al. Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nat. Geosci. 9, 312. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2674 (2016).
3. Mudryk, L. R., Kushner, P. J., Derksen, C. & Thackeray, C. Snow cover response to temperature in observational and climate model ensembles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071789 (2017).
4. Mudryk, L., Brown, R., Derksen C., Luojus K., Decharme B., & Helfrich S. Terrestrial snow cover. In Arctic Report Card 2019. (Richter-Menge, J., Druckenmiller, M. L., Jeffries, M. Eds.). https://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card. (2019).
5. Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).