Shared mechanisms underlie mental imagery and motor planning

Abstract

AbstractMany studies have associated mental imagery with motor control mechanisms by showing mutually active brain areas and functions, as well as similar temporal patterns of imagining and executing the same motor actions. One of the main conjectured mutual mechanisms is the Cerebellar forward-model, commonly believed to generate sensory predictions as part of both motor control and mental imagery processes. Nevertheless, trials to associate one’s overall individual mental and motor capacities have shown only mild and inconsistent correlations, hence challenging the mutual mechanism assumption. We hypothesized that one cause to this inconsistency is the forward-model’s dominance in the motor-planning stage only when adapting to novel sensorimotor environments, while the inverse-model is gradually taking the lead along the adaptation, and therefore biasing most attempts to measure motor-mental overlapping functions and correlate these measurements under regular circumstances. Our current study aimed to tackle and explore this gap using immersive virtual embodiment, by applying an experience of a fundamental sensorimotor conflict, thereby manipulating the sensory prediction mechanism, and presumably forcing an increased involvement of the forward-model in the motor planning stage throughout the experiment. In the study, two groups of subjects (n = 48) performed mental and manual rotation within an immersive, motion-captured, virtual reality environment, while the sensorimotor dynamics of only the test group were altered by physical-virtual speed re-mapping making the virtual hand move twice as fast as the physical hand controlling it. Individual mental imagery capacities were assessed before and after three blocks of manual-rotation, where motor planning durations were measured as the time until motion onset. The results show that virtual sensorimotor alteration extremely increases the correlation of mental imagery and motor planning (r = 0.9, p < .0001) and leads to higher mental imagery performance improvement following the physical blocks. We particularly show that virtual embodiment manipulation affects the motor planning stage to change and functionally overlap with imagery mechanisms, rather than the other way around, which supports our conjecture of an increased sensory-prediction forward-model involvement. Our results shed new light on the embodied nature of mental imagery, support the view of the predictive forward-model as a key mechanism mutually underlying motor control and imagery, and suggest virtual sensorimotor alteration as a novel methodology to increase physical-mental convergence. These findings also suggest the applicability of using existing motion-tracked virtual environments for continuous cognitive evaluation and treatment, through kinematic analysis of ongoing natural motor behaviors.