Author:
Pei Jun,Liao Xu,Ge Lingling,Liu Jianwei,Jiang Xiling
Abstract
AbstractMultiple methods have been proposed for evaluating the symmetry of facial contour by utilizing the median sagittal plane of the skull as a reference and measuring the maxillofacial region. To replace the manual mark point analysis method, we used the anterior cerebral falx plane in MRI images as an indicator of the craniofacial midline. The MRI examination data of 30 individuals were analyzed with a MeVisLab workstation. Two independent examiners performed 15 anthropometric measurements (4 angular, 11 linear) and compared the MRI-based anterior cerebral falx plane with the manual mark point analysis of the craniofacial midline estimation. All measurements were repeated after 3 weeks. Statistical analyses included the repeatability and reproducibility of the 2 methods based on intra-observer and inter-observer correlation coefficients (ICCs), respectively. Precision was estimated by intergroup comparison of the coefficient of variation. The anterior falx plane derived from the MRI data resulted in an intra-observer ICC of 0.869 ± 0.065 (range 0.733–0.936) and inter-observer ICC of 0.876 ± 0.0417 (0.798–0.932) for all measurements, showing significant correlations with the ICC values obtained by the mark point method (p < 0.05). The coefficient of variation showed that the precisions of the 2 methods were statistically comparable. We conclude that, for MRI-based craniofacial midline estimation, measurements made using the anterior cerebral falx plane are as precise, repeatable, and reproducible as those using the manual mark point analysis method. It has a high potential for application in radiation-free 3-dimensional craniofacial analysis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Kornreich, D., Mitchell, A. A., Webb, B. D., Cristian, I. & Jabs, E. W. Quantitative assessment of facial asymmetry using three-dimensional surface imaging in adults: Validating the precision and repeatability of a global approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 53, 126–131 (2016).
2. Hsu, P. J., Denadai, R., Pai, B. C. J., Lin, H. H. & Lo, L. J. Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery. Sci. Rep. 10, 2346 (2020).
3. Yurdakurban, E., Duran, G. S. & Görgülü, S. Evaluation of an automated approach for facial midline detection and asymmetry assessment: A preliminary study. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 24(Suppl 2), 84–91 (2021).
4. Bai, Y. X. Application of three-dimensional digital technology in the diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 51, 326–330 (2016).
5. Qureshi, U. A., Calaguas, S., Frank, E. & Inman, J. Implications of applying new technology in cosmetic and reconstructive facial plastic surgery. Fac. Plast. Surg. 36, 760–767 (2020).