Author:
Sokolovski D.,Akhmatskaya E.
Abstract
AbstractA controversy surrounding the “tunnelling time problem” stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an “operational” angle. Typically, one tries to mimic, in a quantum case, an experiment which yields the desired result for a classical particle. One such approach is based on the use of a Larmor clock. We show that the difficulty with applying a non-perturbing Larmor clock in order to “time” a classically forbidden transition arises from the quantum Uncertainty Principle. We also demonstrate that for this reason a Larmor time (in fact, any Larmor time) cannot be interpreted as a physical time interval. We provide a theoretical description of the quantities measured by the clock.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. MacColl, L. A. Note on the transmission and reflection of wave packets by potential barriers. Phys. Rev. 40, 621 (1932).
2. Satya Sainadh, U., Sang, R. T. & Litvinyuk, I. V. Attoclock and the quest for tunnelling time in strong-field physics. J. Phys. Photonics. 2, 042002 (2020).
3. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. Quantum behavior, chapter 1. in The Feynman Lectures on Physics III (Dover Publications, Inc., 1989).
4. Wigner, E. P. Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift. Phys. Rev. 98, 145 (1955).
5. Smith, F. T. Lifetime matrix in collision theory. Phys. Rev. 118, 349 (1960).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献