Author:
Mamud M. L.,Mudunuru M. K.,Karra S.,Ahmmed B.
Abstract
AbstractPhysics-informed neural networks (PINN) have recently become attractive for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) that describe physics laws. By including PDE-based loss functions, physics laws such as mass balance are enforced softly in PINN. This paper investigates how mass balance constraints are satisfied when PINN is used to solve the resulting PDEs. We investigate PINN’s ability to solve the 1D saturated groundwater flow equations (diffusion equations) for homogeneous and heterogeneous media and evaluate the local and global mass balance errors. We compare the obtained PINN’s solution and associated mass balance errors against a two-point finite volume numerical method and the corresponding analytical solution. We also evaluate the accuracy of PINN in solving the 1D saturated groundwater flow equation with and without incorporating hydraulic heads as training data. We demonstrate that PINN’s local and global mass balance errors are significant compared to the finite volume approach. Tuning the PINN’s hyperparameters, such as the number of collocation points, training data, hidden layers, nodes, epochs, and learning rate, did not improve the solution accuracy or the mass balance errors compared to the finite volume solution. Mass balance errors could considerably challenge the utility of PINN in applications where ensuring compliance with physical and mathematical properties is crucial.
Funder
Center for Nonlinear Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory
DOE SciDAC4
DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Guo, W. Analytical solution of transient radial air flow to an extraction well. J. Hydrol. 194(1–4), 1–14 (1997).
2. Meleshko, S. V. Methods for Constructing Exact Solutions of Partial Differential Equations: Mathematical and Analytical Techniques with Applications to Engineering (Springer, New York, 2005).
3. Wexler, E. J. Analytical solutions for one-, two-, and three-dimensional solute transport in ground-water systems with uniform flow. U.S. Geological Survey, Technical Report (1989).
4. Richardson, L. F. On the approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 83(563), 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1910.0020 (1910).
5. Peiró, J. & Sherwin, S. Finite Difference, Finite Element and Finite Volume Methods for Partial Differential Equations (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8_127.