Author:
M Harsha,Singh Gurpreet,Kumar Vinod,Buduru Arun Balaji,Biswas Sanat K.
Abstract
AbstractWith the sustained rise in satellite deployment in Low Earth Orbits, the collision risk from untracked space debris is also increasing. Often small-sized space debris (below 10 cm) are hard to track using the existing state-of-the-art methods. However, knowing such space debris’ trajectory is crucial to avoid future collisions. We present a Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN)—based approach for estimation of the trajectory of space debris after a collision event between active satellite and space debris. In this work, we have simulated 8565 inelastic collision events between active satellites and space debris. To obtain the states of the active satellite, we use the TLE data of 1647 Starlink and 66 LEMUR satellites obtained from space-track.org. The velocity of space debris is initialized using our proposed velocity sampling method, and the coefficient of restitution is sampled from our proposed Gaussian mixture-based probability density function. Using the velocities of the colliding objects before the collision, we calculate the post-collision velocities and record the observations. The state (position and velocity), coefficient of restitution, and mass estimation of un-tracked space debris after an inelastic collision event along with the tracked active satellite can be posed as an optimization problem by observing the deviation of the active satellite from the trajectory. We have applied the classical optimization method, the Lagrange multiplier approach, for solving the above optimization problem and observed that its state estimation is not satisfactory as the system is under-determined. Subsequently, we have designed Deep Neural network-based methods and Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) based methods for solving the above optimization problem. We have compared the performance of the models using root mean square error (RMSE) and interquartile range of the predictions. It has been observed that the PINN-based methods provide a better estimation performance for position, velocity, mass and coefficient of restitution of the space debris compared to other methods.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Montaruli, M. F. et al. Adaptive track estimation on a radar array system for space surveillance. Acta Astronaut. 198, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.05.051 (2022).
2. Tan, A., Zhang, T. X. & Dokhanian, M. Analysis of the iridium 33 and cosmos 2251 collision using velocity perturbations of the fragments. Adv. Aerospace Sci. Appl. 3, 145 (2013).
3. Datta, A. Op-ed|Damage to Canadarm2 on ISS once again highlights space debris problem (2021).
4. Kelso, T. S. et al. What Happened to BLITS? An Analysis of the 2013 Jan 22 Event. In Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference 4 (2013).
5. Braun, V., Funke, Q., Lemmens, S. & Sanvido, S. Drama 3.0-upgrade of esas debris risk assessment and mitigation analysis tool suite. J. Space Saf. Eng. 7, 206–212 (2020).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献