Author:
Goh Hui Hwang,Li Chunyu,Zhang Dongdong,Dai Wei,Lim Chee Shen,Kurniawan Tonni Agustiono,Goh Kai Chen
Abstract
AbstractSolar energy is a critical component of the energy development strategy. The site selection for solar power plants has a significant impact on the cost of energy production. A favorable situation would result in significant cost savings and increased electricity generation efficiency. California is located in the southwest region of the United States of America and is blessed with an abundance of sunlight. In recent years, the state's economy and population have expanded quickly, resulting in an increased need for power. This study examines the south of California as a possibly well-suited site for the constructing large solar power plants to meet the local electricity needs. To begin, this article imposed some limits on the selection of three potential sites for constructing solar power plants (S1, S2, and S3). Then, a systematic approach for solar power plant site selection was presented, focusing on five major factors (economic, technological, social, geographical, and environmental). This is the first time that the choosing by advantages (CBA) method has been used to determine the optimal sites for solar power plant construction, with the possible sites ranked as S2 > S1 > S3. The results were then compared with traditional methods such as the multi-criteria decision-making method. The findings of this study suggest that the CBA method not only streamlines the solar power plant site selection process but also closely aligns with the objectives and desires of the investors.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Wood, N. & Roelich, K. Tensions, capabilities, and justice in climate change mitigation of fossil fuels. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 52, 114–122 (2019).
2. Sampaio, P. G. V. & González, M. O. A. Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 74, 590–601 (2017).
3. Hashem, I. A. T. et al. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Inf. Syst. 47, 98–115 (2015).
4. Daroń, M. & Wilk, M. Management of energy sources and the development potential in the energy production sector—A comparison of EU countries. Energies 14, 685 (2021).
5. Electric Power Monthly—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/index.php (Accessed 18 Nov 2021) (2021).
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献