Abstract
AbstractSeaweed farming in the United States is gaining significant financial and political support due to prospects to sustainably expand domestic economies with environmentally friendly products. Several networks are seeking appropriate synthesis of available science to both inform policy and substantiate the sector’s sustainability claims. Significant knowledge gaps remain regarding seaweed-specific food hazards and their mitigation; a resource-intensive challenge that can inhibit sustainable policies. This is particularly concerning for rapidly expanding Saccharina latissima (sugar kelp) crops, a brown seaweed that is known to accumulate heavy metals linked to food hazards. Here, we present baseline information about concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury, in both wild and farmed sugar kelp from the New England region. We interpret our findings based on proximity to potential sources of contamination, location on blade, and available heavy metals standards. Contrary to our expectations, high concentrations were widespread in both wild and farmed populations, regardless of proximity to contamination. We find, like others, that cadmium and arsenic consistently reach levels of regulatory concern, and that dried seaweeds could harbor higher concentrations compared to raw products. We also share unique findings that suggest some toxins concentrate at the base of kelp blades. Our results are one step towards aggregating vital data for the region to expand its seaweed farming footprint.
Funder
University of Massachusetts Boston
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Barberi, O. N., Byron, C. J., Burkholder, K. M., St Gelais, A. T. & Williams, A. K. Assessment of bacterial pathogens on edible macroalgae in coastal waters. J. Appl. Phycol. 32(1), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01993-5 (2020).
2. Yarish, C., Kim, J. K., Lindell, S. & Kite-Powell, H. Developing an environmentally and economically sustainable sugar kelp aquaculture industry in southern New England: From seed to market. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/eeb_articles/38 (2017).
3. Bricknell, I. R. et al. Resilience of cold water aquaculture: A review of likely scenarios as climate changes in the Gulf of Maine. Rev. Aquac. 13(1), 460–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12483 (2021).
4. Troell, M., Henriksson, P. J., Buschmann, A. H., Chopin, T. & Quahe, S. Farming the ocean–seaweeds as a quick fix for the climate?. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792 (2022).
5. Theuerkauf, S. J. et al. Habitat value of bivalve shellfish and seaweed aquaculture for fish and invertebrates: Pathways, synthesis and next steps. Rev. Aquac. 14(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222282 (2022).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献