Author:
Bruno Marco,Ghignone Stefano,Aquilano Dino,Nestola Fabrizio
Abstract
AbstractDistinguishing syngenetic from protogenetic inclusions in natural diamonds is one of the most debated issues in diamond research. Were the minerals that now reside in inclusions in diamonds born before the diamond that hosts them (protogenesis)? Or did they grow simultaneously and by the same reaction (syngenesis)? Once previously published data on periclase [(Mg,Fe)O] and magnesiochromite (MgCr2O4) inclusions in diamond have been re-analysed, we show that the main arguments reported so far to support syngenesis between diamond and its mineral inclusions, definitely failed. Hence: (a) the epitaxial relationships between diamond and its mineral inclusion should no longer be used to support syngenesis, because only detecting an epitaxy does not tell us which was the nucleation substrate (there are evidences that in case of epitaxy, the inclusion acts as a nucleation substrate); (b) the morphology of the inclusion should no longer be used as well, as inclusions could be protogenetic regardless their shapes. Finally, we advance the hypothesis that the majority of inclusions in diamonds are protogenetic, e.g., they are constituent of rocks in which diamonds were formed and not products of reactions during diamond growth.
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Harris, J.W. The recognition of diamond inclusions. Pt. 1: Syngenetic inclusions. Ind. Diamond Rev. 28, 402–410 (1968).
2. Nestola, F. et al. Olivine with diamond-imposed morphology included in diamonds: Syngenesis or protogenesis?. Int. Geol. Rev. 56, 1658–1667 (2014).
3. Taylor, L.A., Anand, M. & Promprated, P. Diamonds and their inclusions: Are the criteria for syngenesis valid? In 8th International Kimberlite Conference, Extended Abstract Volume, 397–402 (Victoria, Canada, 2003).
4. Futergendler, S. I. & Frank-Kamenetsky, V. A. Oriented inclusions of olivine, garnet and chrome-spinel in diamonds. Zapisky Vsesoyuznogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshestva 90, 230–236 (1961).
5. Sobolev, N.V. Deep-seated inclusions in kimberlites and the problem of the composition of the upper mantle (American Geophysical Union. Washington D.C, 1977).