Author:
Nunes Felipe S. M.,Soares-Filho Britaldo S.,Oliveira Amanda R.,Veloso Laura V. S.,Schmitt Jair,Van der Hoff Richard,Assis Debora C.,Costa Rayane P.,Börner Jan,Ribeiro Sonia M. C.,Rajão Raoni G. L.,de Oliveira Ubirajara,Costa Marcelo Azevedo
Abstract
AbstractHere, we analyze critical changes in environmental law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon between 2000 and 2020. Based on a dataset of law enforcement indicators, we discuss how these changes explain recent Amazon deforestation dynamics. Our analysis also covers changes in the legal prosecution process and documents a militarization of enforcement between 2018 and 2022. From 2004 to 2018, 43.6 thousand land-use embargoes and 84.3 thousand fines were issued, targeting 3.3 million ha of land, and totaling USD 9.3 billion in penalties. Nevertheless, enforcement relaxed and became spatially more limited, signaling an increasing lack of commitment by the State to enforcing the law. The number of embargoes and asset confiscations dropped by 59% and 55% in 2019 and 2020, respectively. These changes were accompanied by a marked increase in enforcement expenditure, suggesting a massive efficiency loss. More importantly, the creation of so-called conciliation hearings and the centralization of legal processes in 2019 reduced the number of actual judgments and fines collected by 85% and decreased the ratio between lawsuits resulting in paid fines over filed ones from 17 to 5%. As Brazil gears up to crack-down on illegal deforestation once again, our assessment suggests urgent entry points for policy action.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Soares-Filho, B. & Rajão, R. Traditional conservation strategies still the best option. Nat. Sustain. 1, 608–610 (2018).
2. Burgess, R., Costa, F. J. M., & Olken, B. A. The Brazilian Amazon’s double reversal of fortune. SocArXiv. Preprint at https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/67xg5/ (2019).
3. West, T. A. P. & Fearnside, P. M. Brazil’s conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia. Land Use Policy 100, 105072 (2021).
4. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais—INPE. Estimativa de desmatamento por corte raso na Amazônia Legal Brasileira. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/app/dashboard/deforestation/biomes/legal_amazon/rates (2022).
5. Börner, J. et al. The effectiveness of forest conservation policies and programs. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12(1), 45–64 (2020).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献