Author:
Hu Tingting,Du Sisi,Li Xiaoyan,Yang Fang,Zhang Shanshan,Yi Jingjing,Xiao Birong,Li Tingting,He Lin
Abstract
AbstractTo evaluate and establish a prediction model of the outcome of induced labor based on machine learning algorithm. This was a cross-sectional design. The subjects were divided into primipara and multipara, and the risk factors for the outcomes of induced labor were assessed by multifactor logistic regression analysis. The outcome model of labor induced with oxytocin (OT) was constructed based on the four machine learning algorithms, including AdaBoost, logistic regression, naive Bayes classifier, and support vector machine. Factors, such as accuracy, recall, precision, F1 value, and receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the model, and the clinical application of the model was verified. A total of 907 participants were included in this study. Logistic regression algorithm obtained better results in both primipara and multipara groups compared to the other three models. The accuracy of the model for the prediction of “successful induction of labor” was 94.24% and 96.55%, and that of “failed induction of labor” was 65.00% and 66.67% in the primipara and the multipara groups, respectively. This study established a prediction model of OT-induced labor based on the Logistic regression algorithm, with rapid response, high accuracy, and strong extrapolation, which was critical for obstetric clinical nursing.
Funder
Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Saccone, G. et al. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 98(8), 958–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13561 (2019).
2. Page, K., McCool, W. F. & Guidera, M. Examination of the pharmacology of oxytocin and clinical guidelines for use in labor. J. Midwifery Womens Health 62(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12610 (2017).
3. Wormer, K. C., Bauer, A., Williford, A. E. Bishop Score. 2021 Sep 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan. PMID: 29261961.
4. Hostinská, E., Lubušký, M., Huml, K. & Pilka, R. Cervix skóre dle Bishopa a jeho modifikace [Original Bishop score with modifications]. Ceska Gynekol. 81(6), 426–430 (2016).
5. Deo, R. C. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation 132(20), 1920–1930. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 (2015).