When familiarity not novelty motivates information-seeking behaviour

Author:

Brooks Gregory,Whitehead Hannah,Kӧhler Stefan

Abstract

AbstractResearch has established that novelty motivates information-seeking behaviour in many situations. While novelty preferences have been well-studied, an understanding of conditions under which familiarity trumps novelty remains limited. Recent work has revealed that when a metacognitive experience indicates that unsuccessfully recalled information may still be available, a subsequent tendency to seek out unrecalled familiar information can emerge. We conducted three experiments to identify critical factors that determine when familiarity preferences can be observed. Experiment 1 demonstrated the critical role of a recent unsuccessful recall attempt in inducing such a preference. Experiment 2 revealed that the impact of recall attempts is not limited to situations that follow unsuccessful recall, as a familiarity preference was observed even when information was successfully generated. Experiment 3 showed that the level of confidence in the accuracy of any recalled information is a key factor, with moderate levels of confidence leading to the strongest subsequent familiarity preference. Together, our results suggest that novelty preferences in information-seeking are not ubiquitous, as specific situational demands including recent attempted memory retrieval, as well as metacognitive retrieval experiences, can induce familiarity preferences. Our findings can be interpreted within theoretical frameworks that emphasize the role of knowledge gaps as driving factors of information-seeking.

Funder

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference46 articles.

1. Berlyne, D. E. Curiosity and exploration. Science 153, 25–33 (1966).

2. Loewenstein, G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychol. Bull. 116, 75–98 (1994).

3. Kidd, C. & Hayden, B. Y. The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron 88, 449–460 (2015).

4. Gottlieb, J., Lopes, M. & Oudeyer, P.-Y. Motivated cognition: Neural and computational mechanisms of curiosity, attention, and intrinsic motivation. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement Vol. 19 (eds Kim, S. et al.) 149–172 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2016).

5. Hsee, C. K. & Ruan, B. The pandora effect: The power and peril of curiosity. Psychol. Sci. 27, 659–666 (2016).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3