Author:
Zhong Chuheng,Wang Dongping,Zhang Lijuan,Mao Weiqi,Xing Sijia,Chen Jinhui,Xiao Yuan
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to enhance the durability, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of recycled fine aggregate concrete (RFAC) subjected to the combined effects of wet-dry cycles and sulfate erosion. Dry–wet cycle tests were conducted in RFAC with different admixtures of biotite metakaolin (MK) and 15% fly ash (FA) mix (M) under 5% sulfate erosion environment. The effect of 0%, 30%, 60% and 90% recycled fine aggregate (RFA) replacement of natural fine aggregate on mass loss, cubic compressive strength, relative dynamic modulus test of RFAC, damage modeling and prediction of damage life of concrete were investigated. The results showed that the concrete cubic compressive strength and relative dynamic modulus were optimal for recycled concrete at 15% MK biotite dosing and 60% RFA substitution, and its maximum service life was accurately predicted to be about 578 cycles under 5% sulfate dry–wet cycling using Weibull function model. This study is pioneering in addressing the durability of RFAC under sulfate attack combined with wet-dry cycling, employing a novel approach of incorporating MK and FA into RFAC. The findings highlight the practical application potential for using MK and FA in RFAC to produce durable and sustainable construction materials, particularly in sulfate-exposed environments. This research addresses a critical challenge in the construction industry, providing valuable insights for developing more durable and eco-friendly construction materials and contributing to long-term sustainability goals.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
State Key Laboratory of Bridge Structure Health and Safety
Project of Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientific and Technological Innovation Team in Hubei Universities and Colleges
Doctoral Start-up Fund of Hubei University of Technology
Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Aurora Program Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Qin, Z. F., Sun, N. N. & Wen, H. Z. Application status and research progress of recycled aggregate concrete. Mater. Guide 27(23), 142–146 (2013).
2. Kim, J. Influence of quality of recycled aggregates on the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concretes: An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 328, 127071 (2022).
3. Raini, I. et al. Evaluation of mortar properties by combining concrete and brick wastes as fine aggregate. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 13, e00434 (2020).
4. Chen, S. et al. Life-cycle modelling of concrete cracking and reinforcement corrosion in concrete bridges: A case study. Eng. Struct. 237, 112143 (2021).
5. Jin, L. W. et al. Design method of concrete structure durability and life prediction research progress. J. Build. Struct. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jZJGXB.2007.01.002 (2007).