Abstract
AbstractA major racial disparity in prostate cancer (PCa) is that African American (AA) patients have a higher mortality rate than European American (EA) patients. We filtered the SEER 2009–2011 records and divided them into four groups regarding patient races and cancer grades. On such a partition, we performed a series of statistical analyses to further clarify the aforementioned disparity. Molecular evidence for a primary result of the epidemiological analysis was obtained from gene expression data. The results include: (1) Based on the registry-specific measures, a significant linear regression of total mortality rate (as well as PCa specific mortality rate) on the percentage of (Gleason pattern-based) high-grade cancers (PHG) is demonstrated in EAs (p < 0.01) but not in AAs; (2) PHG and its racial disparity are differentiated across ages and the groups defined by patient outcomes; (3) For patients with cancers in the same grade category, i.e. the high or low grade, the survival stratification between races is not significant in most geographical areas; and (4) The genes differentially expressed between AAs’ and EAs’ tumors of the same grade category are relatively rare. The perception that prostate tumors are more lethal in AAs than in EAs is reasonable regarding AAs’ higher PHG, while high grade alone could not imply aggressiveness. However, this perception is questionable when the comparison is focused on cases within the same grade category. Supporting observations for this conclusion hold a remarkable implication for erasing racial disparity in PCa. That is, “Equal grade, equal outcomes” is not only a verifiable hypothesis but also an achievable public health goal.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64, 9–29, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21208 (2014).
2. NCI. Prostate Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, (2018).
3. Noone, A. M. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/ (2018).
4. Haiman, C. A. et al. Characterizing genetic risk at known prostate cancer susceptibility loci in African Americans. Plos Genet. 7, e1001387, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001387 (2011).
5. Chang, B. L. et al. Genome-wide screen for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in men with clinically significant disease. Prostate 64, 356–361, https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20249 (2005).
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献