Author:
Shetty Trilochana,Mayya Y. S.,Kumara K. Sudeep,Sahoo B. K.,Sapra B. K.,Karunakara N.
Abstract
AbstractIn an adjoining publication, we demonstrated the novel technique to harvest soil gas of natural origin as a highly efficient source of 222Rn for calibration applications in a large volume 222Rn calibration chamber. Its advantages over the use of conventional high strength 226Ra sources, such as the capability to serve as a non-depleting reservoir of 222Rn and achieve the desired concentration inside the calibration chamber within a very short time, devoid of radiation safety issues in source handling and licensing requirements from the regulatory authority, were discussed in detail. It was also demonstrated that stability in the 222Rn concentration in large calibration chambers could be achieved within ± 20% deviation from the desired value through a semi-dynamic mode of injection in which 222Rn laden air was periodically pumped to compensate for its loss due to leak and decay. The necessity of developing a theory for determining the appropriate periodicity of pumping was realized to get good temporal stability with a universally acceptable deviation of ≤ ± 10% in the 222Rn concentration. In this paper, we present a mathematical formulation to determine the injection periods (injection pump ON and OFF durations) for the semi-dynamic operation to achieve long term temporal stability in the 222Rn concentration in the chamber. These computed pumping parameters were then used to efficiently direct the injection of soil gas into the chamber. We present the mathematical formulation, and its experimental validations in a large volume calibration chamber (22 m3). With this, the temporal stability of 222Rn concentration in the chamber was achieved with a deviation of ~ 3% from the desired value.
Funder
Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Janik, M. Inter-comparisons exercises of radon and thoron monitors provided by four laboratories: a review. Health Phys. 52, 114–121 (2017).
2. Janik, M. et al. Comparison of radon and thoron concentration measuring systems among Asian countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 5019 (2019).
3. Yamada, Y. et al. Performance of radon/aerosol chamber at NIRS, Japan. Preprint at https://www.ipen.br/biblioteca/cd/irpa/2004/files/6a70.pdf (2001).
4. Jilek, K. & Timkov, J. 2014 ICHLNRRA Intercomparison of Radon/Thoron gas and Radon short-lived decay products measuring instruments in the NRPI Prague. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 164, 556–562 (2014).
5. Kalina, M. C. et al. Intercomparison of radon CR-39 detector systems conducted in CLOR’s calibration chamber. Nucleonika 55, 589–593 (2010).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献