Author:
Park Mi Hee,Kim Chul Jin,Lee Jin Young,Kim In Seon,Kim Sung-Kyu
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study is to check the effectiveness of the analysis method that separates and quantifies β-caryophyllene among clove extracts and validate according to current ICH guidelines. The β-caryophyllene was active constituent of clove buds. The developed method gave a good detection response. In the specificity test, the standard solution was detected at about 17.32 min, and the test solution was detected at 17.32 min. The linearity of β-caryophyllen was confirmed, and at this time, the correlation coefficient (R2) of the calibration curve showed a high linearity of 0.999 or more in the concentration range. The levels of LOD and LOQ were 1.28 ug/mL and 3.89 ug/mL, respectively. The accuracy was confirmed to be 101.6–102.2% and RSD 0.95 ~ 1.31%. As a result of checking the repeatability and inter-tester reproducibility to confirm the precision, the RSD was found to be 1.34 ~ 2.69%. This validated GC method was successfully applied to a soft capsule containing clove extract and other materials for clinical trials. Therefore, this method can be used as an analytical tool for quality control of various samples, including clove extracts and their products of food and pharmaceutical uses.
Funder
This work was supported by the Fostering regional specialized industries+(R&D)-Promoting regional flagship industries, Korea, under the Ministry of SMEs and startups
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. González, A. G. & Herrador, M. A. A practical guide to analytical method validation, including measurement uncertainty and accuracy profiles. Trends Anal. Chem. 26, 227–238 (2007).
2. Geneva. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Topic Q2 (R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology (2005).
3. Sousa, J. P. B. et al. Validation of a gas chromatographic method to quantify sesquiterpenes in copaiba oils. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54, 653–659 (2011).
4. Haque, S.M. & Ratemi, E.S. Drug Development and Analysis Review. Pharm. Chem. J. 50, 837–850 (2017).
5. Fabio, P. et al. The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing good manufacturing practices. Acta Biomed. 90, 288–299 (2019).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献