Author:
Saqr Mohammed,Nouri Jalal,Vartiainen Henriikka,Tedre Matti
Abstract
AbstractProductive and effective collaborative learning is rarely a spontaneous phenomenon but rather the result of meeting a set of conditions, orchestrating and scaffolding productive interactions. Several studies have demonstrated that conflicts can have detrimental effects on student collaboration. Through the application of network science, and social network analysis in particular, this learning analytics study investigates the concept of group robustness; that is, the capacity of collaborative groups to remain functional despite the withdrawal or absence of group members, and its relation to group performance in the frame of collaborative learning. Data on all student and teacher interactions were collected from two phases of a course in medical education that employed an online learning environment. Visual and mathematical analysis were conducted, simulating the removal of actors and its effect on the group’s robustness and network structure. In addition, the extracted network parameters were used as features in machine learning algorithms to predict student performance. The study contributes findings that demonstrate the use of network science to shed light on essential elements of collaborative learning and demonstrates how the concept and measures of group robustness can increase understanding of the conditions of productive collaborative learning. It also contributes to understanding how certain interaction patterns can help to promote the sustainability or robustness of groups, while other interaction patterns can make the group more vulnerable to withdrawal and dysfunction. The finding also indicate that teachers can be a driving factor behind the formation of rich clubs of well-connected few and less connected many in some cases and can contribute to a more collaborative and sustainable process where every student is included.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Jeong, H. & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help?. Educ. Psychol. 51, 247–265 (2016).
2. Dillenbourg, P. What do you mean by collaborative leraning? In Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (ed. Dillenbourg, P.) 1–19 (Elsevier, Oxford, 1999).
3. Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A. & Järvenoja, H. Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning-A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. Int. J. Educ. Res. 68, 1–14 (2014).
4. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. & Suthers, D. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Camb. Handb. Learn. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855 (2014).
5. Prichard, J. S., Bizo, L. A. & Stratford, R. J. The educational impact of team-skills training: Preparing students to work in groups. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 76, 119–140 (2006).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献