Author:
Farahzadi Yeganeh,Alldredge Cameron,Kekecs Zoltán
Abstract
AbstractHypnosis is a psychological intervention that is commonly used to enhance the effectiveness of therapeutic suggestions. Despite extensive fascination and study, the neural mechanisms behind hypnosis remain elusive. In the current study, we undertook a systematic exploration of these neural correlates. We first extracted well-studied neurophysiological features from EEG sensors and source-localized data using spectral analysis and two measures of functional connectivity: weighted phase lag index (wPLI) and power envelope correlation (PEC). Next, we developed classification models that predicted self-rated hypnotic experience based on the extracted feature sets. Our findings reveal that gamma power computed on sensor-level data and beta PEC computed between source-localized brain networks are the top predictors of hypnosis depth. Further, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis suggested reduced gamma power in the midline frontal area and increased beta PEC between interhemispheric Dorsal Attention Networks (DAN) contribute to the hypnotic experience. These results broaden our understanding of the neural correlates of deep hypnosis, highlighting potential targets for future research. Moreover, this study demonstrates the potential of using predictive models in understanding the neural underpinnings of self-reported hypnotic depth, offering a template for future investigations.
Funder
The Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship
National Research, Development and Innovation Office
János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Science
ÚNKP
Eötvös Loránd University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Kihlstrom, J. F. The domain of hypnosis, revisited. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice 21–52 (2008).
2. Terhune, D. B. Defining hypnosis: The pitfalls of prioritizing spontaneous experience over response to suggestion. J. Mind-Body Regul. 2, 115–117 (2014).
3. Lynn, S. J. & Green, J. P. The sociocognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis: Toward a rapprochement. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 59, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570652 (2011).
4. Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R. & Spiegel, D. Advancing research and practice: The revised APA division 30 definition of hypnosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961870 (2015).
5. Braffman, W. & Kirsch, I. Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77, 578 (1999).