Author:
Wu Xuan,Tan Bingyao,Gan Jinyuan,Lam Adeline R.,Chen Yibing,Liu Xinyu,Chua Jacqueline,Wong Damon W. K.,Ang Marcus,Schmetterer Leopold,Yao Xinwen
Abstract
AbstractWe examined the performance of human Schlemm’s canal (SC) imaging using different OCT devices: CIRRUS 5000 (840 nm, spectral-domain (SD)-OCT), PLEX Elite 9000 (1060 nm, swept-source (SS)-OCT) and CASIA SS-1000 (1310 nm, SS-OCT), and analyzed potential impact factors on visualization and the quantitative assessment of SC morphology in a pilot study. Ten healthy subjects were imaged using three OCT devices by a single experienced operator on the same day. Each eye underwent two cubic scans by each device, one on nasal and the other on temporal quadrant. The B-scan showing the largest SC was manually selected for processing. Four quantitative metrics, including one morphological metric as cross-sectional area (CSA), and three performance metrics as contrast, continuity, and coverage, were derived from the datasets. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to investigate the difference between these parameters from the three devices (P < 0.05). We found the CSA measured from CIRRUS was significantly larger than PLEX, followed by CASIA. The contrast was highest in CIRRUS, followed by PLEX and CASIA. The coverage was also higher in CIRRUS as compared to PLEX and CASIA. No significant difference was seen in the continuity from the three devices. In summary, we showed the measurements from the three devices were not interchangeable.
Funder
National Medical Research Council
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Nanyang Technological University
Duke-NUS Medical School
National Research Foundation Singapore
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Johnson, M. C. & Kamm, R. D. The role of Schlemm’s canal in aqueous outflow from the human eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24, 320–325 (1983).
2. Quigley, H. A. & Broman, A. T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 (2006).
3. Moses, R. A., Grodzki, W. J. Jr., Etheridge, E. L. & Wilson, C. D. Schlemm’s canal: the effect of intraocular pressure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 20, 61–68 (1981).
4. Stamer, W. D. et al. Biomechanics of Schlemm’s canal endothelium and intraocular pressure reduction. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 44, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.08.002 (2015).
5. Grant, W. M. Clinical measurements of aqueous outflow. AMA Arch. Ophthalmol. 46, 113–131 (1951).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献