Author:
Hassouneh Layla,Matoug-Elwerfelli Manal,Al-Omari Taher,Setzer Frank C.,Nagendrababu Venkateshbabu
Abstract
AbstractThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the stress distribution and risk of fracture of a non-vital immature maxillary central incisor subjected to various clinical procedures using finite element analysis (FEA). A three-dimensional model of an immature central incisor was developed, from which six main models were designed: untreated immature tooth (C), standard apical plug (AP), resin composite (RC), glass-fibre post (GFP), regeneration procedure (RET), and regeneration with induced root maturation (RRM). Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or Biodentine® were used as an apical or coronal plug. All models simulated masticatory forces in a quasi–static approach with an oblique force of 240 Newton at a 120° to the longitudinal tooth axis. The maximum principal stress, maximum shear stress, risk of fracture, and the strengthening percentage were evaluated. The mean maximum principal stress values were highest in model C [90.3 MPa (SD = 4.4)] and lowest in the GFP models treated with either MTA and Biodentine®; 64.1 (SD = 1.7) and 64.0 (SD = 1.6) MPa, respectively. Regarding the shear stress values, the dentine tooth structure in model C [14.4 MPa (SD = 0.8)] and GFP models [15.4 MPa (SD = 1.1)] reported significantly higher maximum shear stress values compared to other tested models (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were reported between the other models (p > 0.05). No significant differences between MTA and Biodentine® regarding maximum principal stress and maximum shear stress values for each tested model (p > 0.05). A maximum strain value of 4.07E−03 and maximum displacement magnitude of 0.128 mm was recorded in model C. In terms of strengthening percentage, the GFP models were associated with the highest increase (22%). The use of a GFP improved the biomechanical performance and resulted in a lower risk of fracture of a non-vital immature maxillary central incisor in a FEA model.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Duggal, M. et al. Interventions for the endodontic management of non-vital traumatised immature permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents: A systematic review of the evidence and guidelines of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 18, 139–151 (2017).
2. Cvek, M. Treatment of non-vital permanent incisors with calcium hydroxide. I. Follow-up of periapical repair and apical closure of immature roots. Odontol. Revy. 23, 27–44 (1972).
3. Trope, M. Treatment of the immature tooth with a non-vital pulp and apical periodontitis. Dent. Clin. 54, 313–324 (2010).
4. Nazzal, H. & Duggal, M. S. Regenerative endodontics: A true paradigm shift or a bandwagon about to be derailed?. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 18, 3–15 (2017).
5. Fernandes, A. S. & Dessai, G. S. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 14, 355–363 (2001).