Author:
Saleh Neven,Gaber Mohamed N.,Eldosoky Mohamed A.,Soliman Ahmed M.
Abstract
AbstractThe purchase of medical equipment is a critical issue that should be planned properly. The selection of the most appropriate vendor impacts time, effort, and expenses. Therefore, the challenge is to strike a balance between the available budget and the required equipment. The study aims to select the best vendor for supplying medical equipment based on Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) standards. The multi-criteria decision-making approach has been adopted through three methods; Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The criteria of selection are divided into general, technical, and financial. The criteria are weighted using three methods: CRITIC, entropy, and expert judgment. The Vendor Evaluation Program for Medical Equipment (VEPME) is designed to automatically select the best vendor. Medical imaging equipment is selected to test the program by four modalities: X-ray equipment, CT, MRI, and ultrasound. The best scenario was given by the entropy-TOPSIS. As a result, this methodology was adopted by the program. The results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed methodology by comparing the VEPME output to expert judgment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Dyro, J. Clinical engineering handbook (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).
2. Diaconu, K. et al. Methods for medical device and equipment procurement and prioritization within low-and middle-income countries: Findings of a systematic literature review. Global. Health 13, 1–16 (2017).
3. Saleh, N., Gamal, O., Eldosoky, M. A. A. & Shaaban, A. R. A technique of risk management for medical laboratory equipment. In 2022 International congress on human-computer interaction, optimization and robotic applications (HORA) 1–5 (2022). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA55278.2022.9799966.
4. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. & Papayannakis, L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Comput. Oper. Res. 22, 763–770 (1995).
5. Sender, J. S. ECRI institute guidelines Trust. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. JMLA 107, 462 (2019).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献