Author:
Yan Yan,Chen Chen,Peng Xiaotian,Wang Chenchen,Feng Shiyu
Abstract
AbstractThe pressure relief door (PRD) is a vital structure to ensure the safety and reliability of the engine. This paper established a zero-dimensional transient simulation mathematical model to study the plenum compartment pressure threshold and maximum opening angle effects on the nacelle pressure relief process under different opening modes. Then, a computational fluid dynamics model verified by experimental literature data was used to simulate the nacelle pressure relief process and to determine the influence of two different opening modes on the force and discharge characteristics of the PRD. The results of this study show that different opening modes strongly impact the nacelle pressure relief process. Reducing the nacelle compartment pressure threshold of the PRD opening can reduce the time required for the pressure relief process to reach the equilibrium stage. Reducing the maximum opening angle may increase the nacelle compartment pressure during the equilibrium stage. In addition, under the same nacelle compartment pressure thresholds and maximum opening angles, the pressure relief process under the vertical opening mode can reach a lower nacelle compartment pressure during the pressure relief equilibrium stage compared to that under the horizontal opening mode. Therefore, the vertical opening mode is better than the horizontal opening mode. This paper provides two lower calculation costs and high accuracy research models for studying the nacelle pressure relief process.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Civil Aviation Joint Fund
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Interdisciplinary Innovation Foundation for Graduates, NUAA
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Federal Aviation Administration. Induction System Ducts and Air Duct Systems. Advisory Circular No. 25.1103 (1978).
2. Paul, K., Klaus, R. & Jens, T. Technology Preparation for Green Aero Engines. AIAA 2003–2790. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-2790 (2003).
3. Gozawa, M., Takamura, Y., Aoki, T., Iwasaki, K. & Inatani, M. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation analysis on retinal gas cover rates using computational eye models. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 4937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84574-2 (2021).
4. Verseux, O. & Sommerer, Y. New challenges for engine nacelle compartments pressure and thermal loads management with aircraft engine evolution. In 29th International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 501–509, https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2014/data/papers/2014_0501_paper.pdf (2014).
5. Jayathilake, P. G., Li, B., Zuliani, P., Curtis, T. & Chen, J. Modelling bacterial twitching in fluid flows: a CFD-DEM approach. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 14540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51101-3 (2019).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献