Semiochemical-baited traps as a new method supplementing light traps for faunistic and ecological studies of Macroheterocera (Lepidoptera)

Author:

Szanyi SzabolcsORCID,Molnár AttilaORCID,Szanyi KálmánORCID,Tóth MiklósORCID,Jósvai Júlia KatalinORCID,Varga ZoltánORCID,Nagy AntalORCID

Abstract

AbstractAttractivity and selectivity of two types of traps with synthetic, long-lasting, bisexual generic attractants were compared to conventional light traps to promote their wider use, as an easy-to-use standardised method for entomology. The targeted herbivorous Macroheterocera species playing important role in ecosystems as food source for higher trophic levels (e.g. predatory arthropods, birds and mammals), while other hand they can cause significant economic loss in agriculture. Data on their population dynamic and composition of their assemblages are necessary for both nature conservation and efficient pest management. Light- and semiochemical-baited traps with semisynthetic- (SBL = the acronym stands for semisynthetic bisexual lure) and synthetic lures (FLO = the acronym stands for floral lure of synthetic floral compounds) were used in species rich area of West Ukraine, and in all 10,926 lepidopterans trapped were identified. The attractivity of the light trap was highest with 252 species caught, while traps with semiochemicals captured 132 species including 28 exclusively caught only by them. The qualitative selectivity of light vs. semiochemical-baited traps differed considering both taxa and habitat preferences in such a way that they completed each-other. Differences in quantitative selectivity were also proved even in case of pest species. The parameters of methods varied depending on the phenological phases of the studied assemblages. Considering the revealed attractivity and selectivity, the parallel use of the two methods can offer improved reliable data for conservation biology and pest management.

Funder

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal

University of Debrecen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference79 articles.

1. Williams, C. B. Comparing the efficiency of insect traps. Bull. Entomol. Res. 42(3), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748530002890X (1951).

2. Hardwick, D. F. A brief review of the principles of light trap design with a description of an efficient trap for collecting noctuid moths. J. Lepid. Soc. 22, 65–75 (1968).

3. Jermy, T. Survey of swarming of insect pest species. A Növényvédelem Időszerű Kérdései 2, 53–61 (1961) (in Hungarian).

4. Szentkirályi, F. Fifty-year-long insect survey in Hungary: T. Jermy’s contribution to light trapping. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae 48(1), 85–105 (2002).

5. Mészáros, Z. Lebensform-Gruppen schädlicher Lepidopteren und Prognose einzelner Arten mittels Lichtfallen. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2, 262–270 (1967).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3