Combined-electrical optogenetic stimulation but not channelrhodopsin kinetics improves the fidelity of high rate stimulation in the auditory pathway in mice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Combined-electrical optogenetic stimulation but not channelrhodopsin kinetics improves the fidelity of high rate stimulation in the auditory pathway in mice

Published:2024-09-09 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:
ISSN:2045-2322
Container-title:Scientific Reports
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Rep

Author:

Ajay Elise A.,Thompson Alex C.,Azees Ajmal A.,Wise Andrew K.,Grayden David B.,Fallon James B.,Richardson Rachael T.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Australian Government Research Training Program

Bionics Institute Fund

Graeme Clark Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-71712-9.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Birman, C. S. & Sanli, H. Cochlear implant outcomes in patients with severe compared with profound hearing loss. Otol. Neurotol. 41, e458–e463 (2020).

2. Moran, M. et al. Speech perception outcomes for adult cochlear implant recipients using a lateral wall or perimodiolar array. Otol. Neurotol. 40, 608–616 (2019).

3. Távora-Vieira, D., Rajan, G. P., Van de Heyning, P. & Mertens, G. Evaluating the long-term hearing outcomes of cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 40, e575–e580 (2019).

4. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D. & Wang, X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1150–1163 (2001).

5. Nelson, P. B. & Jin, S.-H. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2286–2294 (2004).