Author:
Ammer Tatjana,Schützenmeister André,Prokosch Hans-Ulrich,Rauh Manfred,Rank Christopher M.,Zierk Jakob
Abstract
AbstractReference intervals are essential for the interpretation of laboratory test results in medicine. We propose a novel indirect approach to estimate reference intervals from real-world data as an alternative to direct methods, which require samples from healthy individuals. The presented refineR algorithm separates the non-pathological distribution from the pathological distribution of observed test results using an inverse approach and identifies the model that best explains the non-pathological distribution. To evaluate its performance, we simulated test results from six common laboratory analytes with a varying location and fraction of pathological test results. Estimated reference intervals were compared to the ground truth, an alternative indirect method (kosmic), and the direct method (N = 120 and N = 400 samples). Overall, refineR achieved the lowest mean percentage error of all methods (2.77%). Analyzing the amount of reference intervals within ± 1 total error deviation from the ground truth, refineR (82.5%) was inferior to the direct method with N = 400 samples (90.1%), but outperformed kosmic (70.8%) and the direct method with N = 120 (67.4%). Additionally, reference intervals estimated from pediatric data were comparable to published direct method studies. In conclusion, the refineR algorithm enables precise estimation of reference intervals from real-world data and represents a viable complement to the direct method.
Funder
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Jones, G. & Barker, A. Reference intervals. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 29(Suppl 1), S93–S97 (2008).
2. Horn, P. S. & Pesce, A. J. Reference intervals: An update. Clin. Chim. Acta 334, 5–23 (2003).
3. CLSI. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline - Third Edition. CLSI EP28-A3C (2010).
4. Jones, G. R. D. et al. Indirect methods for reference interval determination—Review and recommendations. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 57, 20–29 (2018).
5. Ozarda, Y. Reference intervals: Current status, recent developments and future considerations. Biochem. Medica 26, 5–16 (2016).
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献