Author:
Beal Jacob,Clore Adam,Manthey Jeff
Abstract
AbstractAs synthetic biology becomes increasingly capable and accessible, it is likewise increasingly critical to be able to make accurate biosecurity determinations regarding the pathogenicity or toxicity of particular nucleic acid or amino acid sequences. At present, this is typically done using the BLAST algorithm to determine the best match with sequences in the NCBI nucleic acid and protein databases. Neither BLAST nor any of the NCBI databases, however, are actually designed for biosafety determination. Critically, taxonomic errors or ambiguities in the NCBI nucleic acid and protein databases can also cause errors in BLAST-based taxonomic categorization. With heavily studied taxa and frequently used biotechnology tools, even low frequency taxonomic categorization issues can lead to high rates of errors in biosecurity decision-making. Here we focus on the implications for false positives, finding that BLAST against NCBI’s protein database will now incorrectly categorize a number of commonly used biotechnology tool sequences as the pathogens or toxins with which they have been used. Paradoxically, this implies that problems are expected to be most acute for the pathogens and toxins of highest interest and for the most widely used biotechnology tools. We thus conclude that biosecurity tools should shift away from BLAST against general purpose databases and towards new methods that are specifically tailored for biosafety purposes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Carlson, R. H. Biology Is Technology : The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (Harvard University Press, 2011).
2. Carter, S. R. & Friedman, R. M. DNA Synthesis and Biosecurity: Lessons Learned and Options for the Future (J. Craig Venter Institute, 2015).
3. DiEuliis, D., Berger, K. & Gronvall, G. Biosecurity implications for the synthesis of horsepox, an orthopoxvirus. Health Secur. 15(6), 629–637 (2017).
4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine et al. Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology (National Academies Press, 2018).
5. Carter, S. R. & Warner, C. M. Trends in synthetic biology applications, tools, industry, and oversight and their security implications. Health Secur. 16(5), 320–333 (2018).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献