Author:
Whyte Henrietta Essie,Montigaud Yoann,Audoux Estelle,Verhoeven Paul,Prier Amélie,Leclerc Lara,Sarry Gwendoline,Laurent Coralie,Le Coq Laurence,Joubert Aurélie,Pourchez Jérémie
Abstract
AbstractAs a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the use of facemasks has become commonplace. The performance of medical facemasks is assessed using Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) tests. However, as BFE tests, require specific expertise and equipment and are time-consuming, the performance of non-medical facemasks is assessed with non-biological Particle Filtration Efficiency (PFE) tests which are comparatively easier to implement. It is necessary to better understand the possible correlations between BFE and PFE to be able to compare the performances of the different types of masks (medical vs. non-medical). In this study BFE results obtained in accordance with the standard EN 14683 are compared to the results of PFE from a reference test protocol defined by AFNOR SPEC S76-001 with the aim to determine if BFE could be predicted from PFE. Our results showed a correlation between PFE and BFE. It was also observed that PFE values were higher than BFE and this was attributed to the difference in particle size distribution considered for efficiency calculation. In order to properly compare these test protocols for a better deduction, it would be interesting to compare the filtration efficiency for a similar granulometric range.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Infection Prevention Precautions. https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions (2020).
2. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Science Brief: SARS-CoV-2 and Potential Airborne Transmission | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/scientific-brief-sars-cov-2.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fmore%2Fscientific-brief-sars-cov-2.html (2020).
3. Tang, J. W., Marr, L. C., Li, Y. & Dancer, S. J. Covid-19 has redefined airborne transmission. BMJ 373, n913 (2021).
4. Allen, J. G. & Ibrahim, A. M. Indoor air changes and potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. JAMA https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.5053 (2021).
5. Greenhalgh, T. et al. Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Lancet 397, 1603–1605 (2021).
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献