Author:
Alford Brian,Landry Brian P.,Hou Sarah,Bower Xavier,Bueno Anna M.,Chen Drake,Husic Brooke,Cantonwine David E.,McElrath Thomas F.,Carozza Jacqueline A.,Wynn Julia,Hoskovec Jennifer,Gray Kathryn J.
Abstract
AbstractWe developed and validated a next generation sequencing-(NGS) based NIPT assay using quantitative counting template (QCT) technology to detect RhD, C, c, E, K (Kell), and Fya (Duffy) fetal antigen genotypes from maternal blood samples in the ethnically diverse U.S. population. Quantitative counting template (QCT) technology is utilized to enable quantification and detection of paternally derived fetal antigen alleles in cell-free DNA with high sensitivity and specificity. In an analytical validation, fetal antigen status was determined for 1061 preclinical samples with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99–100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99–100%). Independent analysis of two duplicate plasma samples was conducted for 1683 clinical samples, demonstrating precision of 99.9%. Importantly, in clinical practice the no-results rate was 0% for 711 RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant people and 0.1% for 769 alloimmunized pregnancies. In a clinical validation, NIPT results were 100% concordant with corresponding neonatal antigen genotype/serology for 23 RhD-negative pregnant individuals and 93 antigen evaluations in 30 alloimmunized pregnancies. Overall, this NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT assay had high performance that was comparable to invasive diagnostic assays in a validation study of a diverse U.S. population as early as 10 weeks of gestation, without the need for a sample from the biological partner. These results suggest that NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT may identify more fetuses at risk for hemolytic disease than current clinical practice, which relies on paternal genotyping and invasive diagnostics and therefore is limited by adherence rates and incorrect results due to non-paternity. Clinical adoption of NIPT for the detection of fetal antigens for both alloimmunized and RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant individuals may streamline care and reduce unnecessary treatment, monitoring, and patient anxiety.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Silver, R. M. Practice bulletin no. 181: Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. Obstet. Gynecol. 130, E57–E70. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002232 (2017).
2. Strengers, P. F. W. Challenges for plasma-derived medicinal products. Transfus Med. Hemother. 50, 116. https://doi.org/10.1159/000528959 (2023).
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Number 192: Management of Alloimmunization During Pregnancy. (ACOG, 2018).
4. Minon, J. M., Gerard, C., Senterre, J. M., Schaaps, J. P. & Foidart, J. M. Routine fetal RHD genotyping with maternal plasma: A four-year experience in Belgium. Transfusion 48, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1537-2995.2007.01533.X (2008).
5. Liu, S. et al. Management and clinical consequences of red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy: A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 100, 2216–2225. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14261 (2021).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献