Author:
Djidonou Desire,Leskovar Daniel I.,Joshi Madhumita,Jifon John,Avila Carlos A.,Masabni Joseph,Wallace Russell W.,Crosby Kevin
Abstract
AbstractGrafting with vigorous rootstocks could offer tomato growers in Texas sustainable and efficient option to achieve reliable yield across a range of production systems and locations. Genotypes (G) of grafted and non-grafted tomato were grown in different environments (E) in the 2017 and 2018 spring seasons. The objectives of the study were to (i) evaluate the effects of production system and grafting on tomato yield traits, (ii) determine the size of genotypic and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) variance components, and (iii) evaluate the relative stability of tested genotypes for yield and its components across production environments. In 2017, genotypes were non-grafted ‘TAMU Hot Ty’ (TAM) and ‘Tycoon’ (TY) and each grafted on commercial tomato rootstocks ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, TY/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, TY/MU) while in 2018, TAM and ‘HM1823’ (HM) were grafted on ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, HM/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, HM/MU). Testing environments were high tunnel (HT) and open-field (OF) in Uvalde in 2017 while in 2018, these were HT and OF in Lubbock (LU-HT, LU-OF), Overton (OV-HT, OV-OF), Uvalde (UV-HT, UV-OF), and Weslaco (WE-HT, WE-OF). Total and marketable yields, fruit number per plant, and average fruit weight were significantly affected by E, G, and G × E interaction. Environmental component contributed 71–86% to the total variation for all these traits, while genotype explained 1.5–10.8%, and the contribution of G × E ranged between 4.3 to 6.7%. Estimation of the univariate statistic parameters and genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) biplot analysis indicated that HM/MU and HM/ES were the most stable graft combination with the highest total and marketable yields, while TAM/ES was very unstable for yields across test environments. TAM/MU was stable but with yield lower than the grand mean. These results suggest that high tomato yields could be consistently achieved with grafted combination (HM/MU and HM/ES) especially under high tunnel production system across the regions of Texas.
Funder
Texas Department of Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Yan, W. & Kang, M. S. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2002).
2. Baraki, F., Tsehaye, Y. & Abay, F. AMMI Analysis of Genotype × Environment interaction and stability of sesame genotypes in northern Ethiopia. Asian J. Plant Sci.13, 178 (2014).
3. Dia, M. et al. Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for watermelon fruit yield in the United States. Crop Sci.56, 1645–1661 (2016).
4. Fasahat, P., Rajabi, A., Mahmoudi, S., Noghabi, M. A. & Rad, J. M. An overview on the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. Biom. Biostat. Int. J.2, 00043 (2015).
5. Teodoro, P. E. et al. Adaptability and stability of cotton genotypes regarding fiber yield and quality traits. Crop Sci.59, 518–424 (2019).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献