Author:
Tabassum Sazia,Kotnala C. B.,Salman Mohammed,Tariq Mohd,Khan Afzal Husain,Khan Nadeem A.
Abstract
AbstractThis study, centered on the Asan Wetland in Uttarakhand, examines the ecological impact of heavy metals on aquatic insects biodiversity. It highlights the detrimental effects of metals like chromium, mercury, and lead, stemming from natural and anthropogenic sources, on aquatic insects diversity. Aquatic insects, particularly sensitive to water quality, are emphasized as key indicators of environmental health, illustrating the importance of understanding and managing the influences on wetland ecosystems. Wetland ecosystems are vulnerable to various environmental stressors, including pollution from heavy metals. These toxic substances can alter water quality parameters, disrupt nutrient cycling, and negatively impact the biodiversity and ecological balance of the system. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of several heavy metals (namely Cd, As, Cu, Fe, Pb, Ni, Zn, Al, Cr) on the distribution and biodiversity of various aquatic insect species, including Coeleoptera, Diptera, Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera. The research utilized data collected between November 2021 and October 2022 from specifically chosen sites (S1, S2, S3) within the Asan Wetland in Dehradun, Uttarakhand. After collecting and identifying samples, various statistical (Sorenson, Shannon-Weiner diversity index, Margelef index) and multivariate tests (CCA, PCA, One-way Anova), have been applied to show the effects of these parameters. This study offers significant findings regarding the distribution patterns of heavy metals, the abundance of aquatic insects, and their interconnectedness within the ecosystem of the Asan Wetland. The abundance of aquatic insects, represented by 13 genera belonging to 6 orders, was assessed at three different sites (S1, S2, and S3) within the wetland. It was concluded that the heavy metals concentration and aquatic insects’ density increases and decreases vice-versa in monsoon and winter seasons might be due to unfavourable factors. These findings contribute to the understanding of ecological dynamics and potential impacts of heavy metals on aquatic biota in wetland environments.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Gautam, P. K., Gautam, R. K., Banerjee, S., Chattopadhyaya, M. C. & Pandey, J. D. Heavy metals in the environment: Fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies. Heavy Metals Sour. Toxic. Remediat. Tech. 60, 101–130 (2016).
2. Pueyo, M. et al. Certification of the extractable contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a freshwater sediment following a collaboratively tested and optimised three-step sequential extraction procedure. J. Environ. Monit. 3(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1039/b010235k (2001).
3. Davidson, C. M., Duncan, A. L., Littlejohn, D., Ure, A. M. & Garden, L. M. A critical evaluation of the three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure to assess the potential mobility and toxicity of heavy metals in industrially-contaminated land. Anal. Chim. Acta 363(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00057-9 (1998).
4. Varol, M. & Şen, B. Assessment of nutrient and heavy metal contamination in surface water and sediments of the upper Tigris River, Turkey. Catena 92, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.011 (2012).
5. Amaravathi, D., Raja Sekhar, P. S. & Rama, R. K. Entomofaunal diversity in Kondakarla freshwater lake ecosystem at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6(6), 880 (2018).