The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: an empirical approach

Author:

Krügel Sebastian,Uhl Matthias

Abstract

AbstractHow would people distribute risks of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in everyday road traffic? The rich literature on the ethics of autonomous vehicles (AVs) revolves around moral judgments in unavoidable collision scenarios. We argue for extending the debate to driving behaviors in everyday road traffic where ubiquitous ethical questions arise due to the permanent redistribution of risk among road users. This distribution of risks raises ethically relevant questions that cannot be evaded by simple heuristics such as “hitting the brakes.” Using an interactive, graphical representation of different traffic situations, we measured participants’ preferences on driving maneuvers of AVs in a representative survey in Germany. Our participants’ preferences deviated significantly from mere collision avoidance. Interestingly, our participants were willing to take risks themselves for the benefit of other road users, suggesting that the social dilemma of AVs may be mitigated in risky environments. Our research might build a bridge between engineers and philosophers to discuss the ethics of AVs more constructively.

Funder

Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (bidt), Germany

Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference30 articles.

1. Foot, P. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxf. Rev. 5, 5–15 (1967).

2. Goodall, N. J. Away from trolley problems and toward risk management. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 810–821 (2016).

3. Nyholm, S. & Smids, J. The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem?. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 19(5), 1275–1289 (2016).

4. Trussell, H. (2018) Why a special issue on machine ethics. Proc. IEEE 106(10), 1774–1776.

5. Keeling, G., Evans, K., Thornton, S. M., Mecacci, G. & Santoni de Sio, F. Four perspectives on what matters for the ethics of automated vehicles. In Automated Vehicles Symposium 49–60 (Springer, 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3