Author:
Alamoudi Ragda,Kanavakis Georgios,Oeschger Elias S.,Halazonetis Demetrios,Gkantidis Nikolaos
Abstract
AbstractNon-syndromic permanent tooth agenesis affects a significant proportion of the population, especially if third molars are considered. Although tooth agenesis has been linked to a smaller craniofacial size, reduced facial convexity and a shorter skeletal face, the occlusal characteristics of individuals with tooth agenesis remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this study investigated potential associations between tooth agenesis and metric occlusal traits in 806 individuals (491 with 4.1 missing teeth per subject, including third molars, and 315 without any tooth agenesis). Dentoskeletal morphology was defined through anatomical landmarks on pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs. Multivariate regression models, adjusted for sex and age, showed that tooth agenesis was significantly associated with a reduced overjet, an increased interincisal angle, and shorter upper and lower dental arch lengths, but not with overbite. Moreover, apart from reduced tooth length and dentoalveolar effects, as the number of missing teeth increased the upper front teeth were progressively retruded according to the craniofacial complex and to the face. Thus, tooth agenesis has a substantial influence on dental and occlusal characteristics, as well as on the sagittal position and inclination of anterior teeth. These findings emphasize the necessity for personalized, multidisciplinary approaches in individuals with multiple agenesis to successfully meet treatment goals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Khalaf, K., Miskelly, J., Voge, E. & Macfarlane, T. V. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthod. 41, 299–316 (2014).
2. Rakhshan, V. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the most commonly missing permanent dentition (excluding the third molars) in non-syndromic dental patients or randomly-selected subjects, and the factors affecting the observed rates. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 39, 199–207 (2015).
3. Carter, K. & Worthington, S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 94, 886–894 (2015).
4. Scheiwiller, M., Oeschger, E. S. & Gkantidis, N. Third molar agenesis in modern humans with and without agenesis of other teeth. PeerJ 8, e10367 (2020).
5. Gkantidis, N. et al. Patterns of non-syndromic permanent tooth agenesis in a large orthodontic population. Arch. Oral. Biol. 79, 42–47 (2017).