Author:
Singh Kuldeep,Paliwal Nitin,Kasamias Konstantinos
Abstract
AbstractWe proposed the Representative Elementary Area (REA) analysis method and illustrated how it is needed to evaluate representative roughness parameters of surfaces. We used mean height (Sa) roughness to study how its variations converge to a steady state as we expanded the area of investigation (AOI) using combined scan tiles obtained through Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. We tested quartz and glass surfaces, subjecting them to various levels of polishing with grit sizes ranging between # 60 and #1200. The scan tiles revealed a multiscale roughness texture characterized by the dominance of valleys over peaks, lacking a fractal nature. REA analysis revealed Sa variations converged to a steady state as AOI increased, highlighting the necessity of the proposed method. The steady-state Sa, denoted as $${{\text{Sa}}}_{{\text{REA}}}$$
Sa
REA
, followed an inverse power law with polishing grit size, with its exponent dependent on the material hardness. The REA length representing $${{\text{Sa}}}_{{\text{REA}}}$$
Sa
REA
of glass surfaces, followed another inverse power law with polishing grit size and an indeterminate relationship for quartz surfaces. The multiscale characteristics and convergence to steady state were also evident in skewness, kurtosis, and autocorrelation length (Sal) parameters. Sal increased to a maximum value before decreasing linearly as AOI was linearly increased. The maximum Sal, termed as $${{\text{Sal}}}_{{\text{max}}}$$
Sal
max
, exhibited a linear relationship with REA. In the absence of REA analysis, the magnitude of uncertainty depended on the polishing grit size. Finely polished surfaces exhibited a 10–20% variability, which increased to up to 70% relative to the steady-state Sa with coarser polishing.
Funder
American Chemical Society
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. ISO 25178-2 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:25178:-2:ed-2:v1:en (2021).
2. Mehmani, A., Kelly, S., Torres-Verdin, C. & Balhoff, M. Residual oil saturation following gas injection in sandstones: Microfluidic quantification of the impact of pore-scale surface roughness. Fuel 251, 147–161 (2019).
3. Stigliano, L., Siena, M., Ackerer, P., Guadagnini, A. & Daval, D. Statistical description of calcite surface roughness resulting from dissolution at close-to-equilibrium conditions. ACS Earth Sp. Chem. 5(11), 3115–3129 (2021).
4. Anbeek, C. Surface roughness of minerals and implications for dissolution studies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac 56(4), 1461–1469 (1992).
5. Brantley, S. L. Kinetics of mineral dissolution. In Kinetics of Water-Rock Interaction, Brantley, S. L.; Kubicki, J. D.; White, A. F., Eds. pp 151–210 (Springer New York: New York, NY, 2008).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献