Understanding who talks about what: comparison between the information treatment in traditional media and online discussions

Author:

Schawe Hendrik,Beiró Mariano G.,Alvarez-Hamelin J. Ignacio,Kotzinos Dimitris,Hernández Laura

Abstract

AbstractWe study the dynamics of interactions between a traditional medium, the New York Times journal, and its followers in Twitter, using a massive dataset. It consists of the metadata of the articles published by the journal during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the posts published in Twitter by a large set of followers of the @nytimes account along with those published by a set of followers of several other media of different kind. The dynamics of discussions held in Twitter by exclusive followers of a medium show a strong dependence on the medium they follow: the followers of @FoxNews show the highest similarity to each other and a strong differentiation of interests with the general group. Our results also reveal the difference in the attention payed to U.S. presidential elections by the journal and by its followers, and show that the topic related to the “Black Lives Matter” movement started in Twitter, and was addressed later by the journal.

Funder

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference65 articles.

1. Hard, W. Radio and public opinion. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 177, 105–113 (1935).

2. Gilmont, J.-F. La Réforme et le livre : l’Europe de l’imprimé (1517-v. 1570) (Paris: Les Editions du Cerf, 1990). https://www.persee.fr/doc/bec_0373-6237_1991_num_149_1_450612_t1_0174_0000_001.

3. https://www.nytimes.com/1899/05/07/archives/future-of-wireless-telegraphy.html.

4. Douglas, S. J. Public radio and television in America: A political history. Public Opin. Q. 63, 439–441 (1999).

5. Gaumont, N., Panahi, M. & Chavalarias, D. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election. PLoS ONE 13, 1–38 (2018).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Information wars in the contemporary world and simulation of news dissemination;Economics and Mathematical Methods;2024-09-04

2. Delay model for the dynamics of information units in the digital environment;Frontiers in Complex Systems;2024-04-11

3. Digital Literacy in Basic Secondary School Students: A Gender Comparative Study;2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER);2023-12-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3