Author:
Straw Edward A.,Cini Elena,Gold Harriet,Linguadoca Alberto,Mayne Chloe,Rockx Joris,Brown Mark J. F.,Garratt Michael P. D.,Potts Simon G.,Senapathi Deepa
Abstract
AbstractMany pollinators, including bumble bees, are in decline. Such declines are known to be driven by a number of interacting factors. Decreases in bee populations may also negatively impact the key ecosystem service, pollination, that they provide. Pesticides and parasites are often cited as two of the drivers of bee declines, particularly as they have previously been found to interact with one another to the detriment of bee health. Here we test the effects of an insecticide, sulfoxaflor, and a highly prevalent bumble bee parasite, Crithidia bombi, on the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. After exposing colonies to realistic doses of either sulfoxaflor and/or Crithidia bombi in a fully crossed experiment, colonies were allowed to forage on field beans in outdoor exclusion cages. Foraging performance was monitored, and the impacts on fruit set were recorded. We found no effect of either stressor, or their interaction, on the pollination services they provide to field beans, either at an individual level or a whole colony level. Further, there was no impact of any treatment, in any metric, on colony development. Our results contrast with prior findings that similar insecticides (neonicotinoids) impact pollination services, and that sulfoxaflor impacts colony development, potentially suggesting that sulfoxaflor is a less harmful compound to bee health than neonicotinoids insecticides.
Funder
European Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
University of Reading Undergraduate Research Opportunities Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference88 articles.
1. IPBES. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. NERC Report (2016).
2. Klein, A. M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 303–313 (2007).
3. Gazzea, E., Batáry, P. & Marini, L. Global meta-analysis shows reduced quality of food crops under inadequate animal pollination. Nat. Commun. 14, 4463 (2023).
4. Bartomeus, I. et al. Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 4656–4660 (2013).
5. Nieto, A. et al. European Red List of Bees (Publication Office of the European Union, 2014).