Author:
Kurzella Jessica,Miskel Dennis,Rings Franca,Tholen Ernst,Tesfaye Dawit,Schellander Karl,Salilew-Wondim Dessie,Held-Hoelker Eva,Große-Brinkhaus Christine,Hoelker Michael
Abstract
AbstractThe major limitation of the widespread use of IVP derived embryos is their consistent deficiencies in vitality when compared with their ex vivo derived counterparts. Although embryo metabolism is considered a useful metric of embryo quality, research connecting mitochondrial function with the developmental capacity of embryos is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse bovine embryo respiration signatures in relation to developmental capacity. This was achieved by taking advantage of two generally accepted metrics for developmental capacity: (I) environmental conditions during development (vivo vs. vitro) and (II) developmental kinetics (day 7 vs. day 8 blastocysts). Our study showed that the developmental environment affected total embryo oxygen consumption while different morphokinetics illustrating the embryo qualities correlate with maximal mitochondrial respiration, mitochondrial spare capacity, ATP-linked respiration as well as efficiency of ATP generation. This respiration fingerprint for high embryo quality is reflected by relatively lower lipid contents and relatively higher ROS contents. In summary, the results of the present study extend the existing knowledge on the relationship between bovine embryo quality and the signature of mitochondrial respiration by considering contrasting developmental environments as well as different embryo morphokinetics.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Chair, J. 2020 Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. https://www.iets.org/Portals/0/Documents/Public/Committees/DRC/IETS_Data_Retrieval_Report_2020.pdf (2021).
2. Lonergan, P., Rizos, D., Gutiérrez-Adán, A., Fair, T. & Boland, M. P. Effect of culture environment on embryo quality and gene expression—Experience from animal studies. Reprod. Biomed. Online 7, 657–663 (2003).
3. Lonergan, P., Rizos, D., Ward, F. & Boland, M. P. Factors influencing oocyte and embryo quality in cattle. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 41, 427–437 (2001).
4. Lonergan, P. & Fair, T. Maturation of oocytes in vitro. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 4, 255–268 (2016).
5. Hansen, P. J. The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren’t pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it?. J. Anim. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa288 (2020).