Author:
Bandini Elisa,Tennie Claudio
Abstract
AbstractAlthough once regarded as a unique human feature, tool-use is widespread in the animal kingdom. Some of the most proficient tool-users are our closest living relatives, chimpanzees. These repertoires however consist primarily of tool use, rather than tool manufacture (for later use). Furthermore, most populations of chimpanzees use organic materials, such as sticks and leaves, rather than stones as tools. This distinction may be partly ecological, but it is also important as chimpanzees are often used as models for the evolution of human material culture, the oldest traces of which consist of manufactured sharp stone tools (so-called “flakes”). Thus, examining the conditions (if any) under which chimpanzees may develop flake manufacture and use can provide insight into the drivers of these behaviours in our own lineage. Previous studies on non-human apes’ ability to make and use flakes focused on enculturated apes, giving them full demonstrations of the behaviour immediately, without providing social information on the task in a stepwise manner. Here we tested naïve, captive chimpanzees (N = 4; three potentially enculturated and one unenculturated subject) in a social learning experimental paradigm to investigate whether enculturated and/or unenculturated chimpanzees would develop flake making and use after social information of various degrees (including a human demonstration) was provided in a scaffolded manner. Even though social learning opportunities were provided, neither the unenculturated subject nor any of the potentially enculturated subjects made or used flakes, in stark contrast to previous studies with enculturated apes. These data suggest that flake manufacture and use is outside of our tested group of captive chimpanzees’ individual and social learning repertoires. It also suggests that high levels of enculturation alongside human demonstrations (and/or training) may be required before captive chimpanzees can develop this behaviour.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
University of Zurich Postdoc Grant
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Whiten, A. et al. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399(6737), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/21415 (1999).
2. Bandini, E., Harrison, R. A. & Motes-Rodrigo, A. Examining the suitability of extant primates as models of hominin stone tool culture. Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01091-x (2022).
3. McGrew, W., Marchant, L., Wrangham, R. W. & Klein, H. Manual laterality in anvil use: Wild chimpanzees cracking Strychnos fruits. Laterality 4, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069887600760101 (1999).
4. Marchant, L. F. & McGrew, W. C. Percussive technology: Chimpanzee baobab smashing and the evolutionary modelling of hominin knapping. In Stone Knapping: The Necessary Conditions for a Uniquely Hominin Behaviour (eds Roux, V. & Bril, B.) (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2005).
5. Koops, K., McGrew, W. C. & Matsuzawa, T. Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use cleavers and anvils to fracture Treculia africana fruits? Preliminary data on a new form of percussive technology. Primates 51, 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-009-0178-6 (2010).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献