Author:
Perez Santangelo Agustín,Solovey Guillermo
Abstract
Abstract
Misinformation harms society by affecting citizens' beliefs and behaviour. Recent research has shown that partisanship and cognitive reflection (i.e. engaging in analytical thinking) play key roles in the acceptance of misinformation. However, the relative importance of these factors remains a topic of ongoing debate. In this registered study, we tested four hypotheses on the relationship between each factor and the belief in statements made by Argentine politicians. Participants (N = 1353) classified fact-checked political statements as true or false, completed a cognitive reflection test, and reported their voting preferences. Using Signal Detection Theory and Bayesian modeling, we found a reliable positive association between political concordance and overall belief in a statement (median = 0.663, CI95 = [0.640, 0.685]), a reliable positive association between cognitive reflection and scepticism (median = 0.039, CI95 = [0.006, 0.072]), a positive but unreliable association between cognitive reflection and truth discernment (median = 0.016, CI95 = [− 0.015, 0.046]) and a positive but unreliable association between cognitive reflection and partisan bias (median = 0.016, CI95 = [− 0.006, 0.037]). Our results highlight the need to further investigate the relationship between cognitive reflection and partisanship in different contexts and formats.
Protocol registration
The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 22 August 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EBRGC.
Funder
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference99 articles.
1. Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A. & Sheble, L. Misinformation and Mass Audiences (University of Texas Press, 2018).
2. Burki, T. Vaccine misinformation and social media. Lancet Digit. Health 1, e258–e259 (2019).
3. Kata, A. A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine 28, 1709–1716 (2010).
4. Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K. & Larson, H. J. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 337–348 (2021).
5. Hornsey, M. J. & Fielding, K. S. Understanding (and reducing) inaction on climate change. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 14, 3–35 (2020).