Author:
Daisaki Hiromitsu,Kitajima Kazuhiro,Nakajo Masatoyo,Watabe Tadashi,Ito Kimiteru,Sakamoto Fumi,Nakahara Tadaki,Ishibashi Mana,Toriihara Akira
Abstract
AbstractThis study assessed the possibility of semi-automatic harmonization of standardized uptake values (SUVs) in multicenter studies. Phantom data were acquired using 16 PET/CT scanners (including 3 PET/CT scanners with a silicon photomultiplier detector). PET images obtained using 30-min/bed scans for optimum harmonization filter calculations and using 90–180-s/bed scans for SUV validation under clinical conditions were obtained. Time of flight and a reconstruction method with point-spread function correction were allowed. The optimal full width at half maximum of the 3D-Gaussian filter that minimizes the root mean square error with the median value of the JSNM harmonization range was calculated semi-automatically. The SUVmax and the SUVpeak of the hot spheres were measured, and the inter-scanner coefficient of variation (COV) was calculated before and after harmonization. The harmonization filter was applied to 11 of the 15 PET/CT scanners in which the SUV calibration accuracy had been verified, but not in the remaining 4 scanners. Under noiseless conditions before harmonization, the inter-scanner COVs of the SUVmax and the SUVpeak were as high as 21.57% and 12.20%, respectively, decreasing to 8.79% and 5.73% after harmonization, respectively. Harmonization brought the SUVmax of all the hot spheres to within the harmonization range. Even under clinical conditions affected by image noise, the inter-scanner COVs for the SUVmax and SUVpeak were as high as 8.83% and 5.18% after harmonization, respectively. By applying an optimal harmonization filter that is calculated semi-automatically, the harmonization of SUVs according to the JSNM strategy is possible in multicenter studies, thereby reducing inter-scanner COVs.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Bar-Shalom, R. et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 44, 1200–1209 (2003).
2. Jadvar, H. et al. Appropriate use criteria for 18F-FDG PET/CT in restaging and treatment response assessment of malignant disease. J Nucl Med. 58, 2026–2037 (2017).
3. Na, S. J. et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Nucl Med. 58, 730–736 (2017).
4. Lodge, M. A., Chaudhry, M. A. & Wahl, R. L. Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value. J Nucl Med. 53, 1041–1047 (2012).
5. Vanderhoek, M., Perlman, S. B. & Jeraj, R. Impact of the definition of peak standardized uptake value on quantification of treatment response. J Nucl Med. 53, 4–11 (2012).
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献