Author:
Panunzi Simona,Lucca Lucia Francesca,De Tanti Antonio,Cava Francesca,Romoli Annamaria,Formisano Rita,Scarponi Federico,Estraneo Anna,Frattini Diana,Tonin Paolo,Piergentilli Ilaria,Pioggia Giovanni,De Gaetano Andrea,Cerasa Antonio
Abstract
AbstractThis study describes a dynamic non-linear mathematical approach for modeling the course of disease in acquired brain injury (ABI) patients. Data from a multicentric study were used to evaluate the reliability of the Michaelis–Menten (MM) model applied to well-known clinical variables that assess the outcome of ABI patients. The sample consisted of 156 ABI patients admitted to eight neurorehabilitation subacute units and evaluated at baseline (T0), 4 months after the event (T1) and at discharge (T2). The MM model was used to characterize the trend of the first Principal Component Analysis (PCA) dimension (represented by the variables: feeding modality, RLAS, ERBI-A, Tracheostomy, CRS-r and ERBI-B) in order to predict the most plausible outcome, in terms of positive or negative Glasgow outcome score (GOS) at discharge. Exploring the evolution of the PCA dimension 1 over time, after day 86 the MM model better differentiated between the time course for individuals with a positive and negative GOS (accuracy: 85%; sensitivity: 90.6%; specificity: 62.5%). The non-linear dynamic mathematical model can be used to provide more comprehensive trajectories of the clinical evolution of ABI patients during the rehabilitation period. Our model can be used to address patients for interventions designed for a specific outcome trajectory.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Turner-Stokes, L., Pick, A., Nair, A., Disler, P. B. & Wade, T. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub3 (2015).
2. GBD. Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30415-0 (2016) (Erratum in: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7).
3. GBD. Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18(5), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1 (2016).
4. Avesani, R., Fedeli, M., Ferraro, C. & Khansefid, M. Use of early indicators in rehabilitation process to predict functional outcomes in subjects with acquired brain injury. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 47, 203–212 (2011).
5. Steyerberg, E. W. et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 5(8), e165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165 (2008) (discussion e165).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献