Author:
Kenny Jon-Émile S.,Munding Chelsea E.,Eibl Joseph K.,Eibl Andrew M.,Long Bradley F.,Boyes Aaron,Yin Jianhua,Verrecchia Pietro,Parrotta Matthew,Gatzke Ronald,Magnin Paul A.,Burns Peter N.,Foster F. Stuart,Demore Christine E. M.
Abstract
AbstractQuantitative Doppler ultrasound of the carotid artery has been proposed as an instantaneous surrogate for monitoring rapid changes in left ventricular output. Tracking immediate changes in the arterial Doppler spectrogram has value in acute care settings such as the emergency department, operating room and critical care units. We report a novel, hands-free, continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound patch that adheres to the neck and tracks Doppler blood flow metrics in the common carotid artery using an automated algorithm. String and blood-mimicking test objects demonstrated that changes in velocity were accurately measured using both manually and automatically traced Doppler velocity waveforms. In a small usability study with 22 volunteer users (17 clinical, 5 lay), all users were able to locate the carotid Doppler signal on a volunteer subject, and, in a subsequent survey, agreed that the device was easy to use. To illustrate potential clinical applications of the device, the Doppler ultrasound patch was used on a healthy volunteer undergoing a passive leg raise (PLR) as well as on a congestive heart failure patient at resting baseline. The wearable carotid Doppler patch holds promise because of its ease-of-use, velocity measurement accuracy, and ability to continuously record Doppler spectrograms over many cardiac and respiratory cycles.
Funder
Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
Ontario Centres of Excellence
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Canadian Foundation for Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Elgendy, A., Seppelt, I. M. & Lane, A. S. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients. Crit. Care Resusc. 19, 222–229 (2017).
2. Bentzer, P. et al. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids?. JAMA 316, 1298–1309 (2016).
3. Berlin, D. A. & Bakker, J. Starling curves and central venous pressure. Crit. Care 19, 55 (2015).
4. Kenny, J-E. S., Barjaktarevic, I. Letter: Stroke Volume is the Key Measure of Fluid Responsiveness. Crit. Care (2021), in press.
5. Malbrain, M. L. et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann. Intensive Care 8, 66 (2018).
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献