Author:
Álvarez Daniel,Cerezo-Hernández Ana,Crespo Andrea,Gutiérrez-Tobal Gonzalo C.,Vaquerizo-Villar Fernando,Barroso-García Verónica,Moreno Fernando,Arroyo C. Ainhoa,Ruiz Tomás,Hornero Roberto,del Campo Félix
Abstract
AbstractThe most appropriate physiological signals to develop simplified as well as accurate screening tests for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) remain unknown. This study aimed at assessing whether joint analysis of at-home oximetry and airflow recordings by means of machine-learning algorithms leads to a significant diagnostic performance increase compared to single-channel approaches. Consecutive patients showing moderate-to-high clinical suspicion of OSA were involved. The apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) from unsupervised polysomnography was the gold standard. Oximetry and airflow from at-home polysomnography were parameterised by means of 38 time, frequency, and non-linear variables. Complementarity between both signals was exhaustively inspected via automated feature selection. Regression support vector machines were used to estimate the AHI from single-channel and dual-channel approaches. A total of 239 patients successfully completed at-home polysomnography. The optimum joint model reached 0.93 (95%CI 0.90–0.95) intra-class correlation coefficient between estimated and actual AHI. Overall performance of the dual-channel approach (kappa: 0.71; 4-class accuracy: 81.3%) significantly outperformed individual oximetry (kappa: 0.61; 4-class accuracy: 75.0%) and airflow (kappa: 0.42; 4-class accuracy: 61.5%). According to our findings, oximetry alone was able to reach notably high accuracy, particularly to confirm severe cases of the disease. Nevertheless, oximetry and airflow showed high complementarity leading to a remarkable performance increase compared to single-channel approaches. Consequently, their joint analysis via machine learning enables accurate abbreviated screening of OSA at home.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Peppard, P. E. et al. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 177, 1006–1014 (2013).
2. Benjafield, A. et al. An estimate of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea. The Lancet, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5 (2019).
3. Franklin, K. A. & Lindberg, E. Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder in the population-a review on the epidemiology of sleep apnea. J. Thorac. Dis. 7, 1311–1322 (2015).
4. Lévy, P. et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 1, 15015 (2015).
5. Tarasiuk, A. & Reuveni, H. The economic impact of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 19, 639–644 (2013).
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献