Author:
Coppitters Diederik,Contino Francesco
Abstract
AbstractDespite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates significantly from the predicted scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose an antifragile design optimization framework that redefines the indicator to optimize variability and introduces an antifragility indicator. The variability is optimized by favoring upside potential and providing downside protection towards a minimum acceptable performance, while the skewness indicates (anti)fragility. An antifragile design primarily enhances positive outcomes when the uncertainty of the random environment exceeds initial estimations. Hence, it circumvents the issue of underestimating the uncertainty in the operating environment. We applied the methodology to the design of a wind turbine for a community, considering the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) as the quantity of interest. The design with optimized variability proves beneficial in 81% of the possible scenarios when compared to the conventional robust design. The antifragile design flourishes (LCOE drops by up to 120%) when the real-world uncertainty is higher than initially estimated in this paper. In conclusion, the framework provides a valid metric for optimizing the variability and detects promising antifragile design alternatives.
Funder
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Belgische Federale Overheidsdiensten
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Moret, S., Gironès, V. C., Bierlaire, M. & Maréchal, F. Characterization of input uncertainties in strategic energy planning models. Appl. Energy 202, 597–617 (2017).
2. International Energy Agency. Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) Retrospective Review: Evaluation of AEO2020 and Previous Reference Case Projections (U.S. Department of Energy, 2020).
3. Keirstead, J., Jennings, M. & Sivakumar, A. A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3847–3866 (2012).
4. Grossmann, I. E., Apap, R. M., Calfa, B. A., García-Herreros, P. & Zhang, Q. Recent advances in mathematical programming techniques for the optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Comput. Chem. Eng. 91, 3–14 (2016).
5. Ehsan, A. & Yang, Q. State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review. Appl. Energy 239, 1509–1523 (2019).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献