The influence of electrocardiogram (ECG) filters on the heights of R and T waves in children

Author:

Hirokawa Jun,Hitosugi Takashi,Miki Yoichiro,Tsukamoto Masanori,Yamasaki Fumiyasu,Kawakubo Yoshifumi,Yokoyama Takeshi

Abstract

AbstractAnesthesiologists often compare intraoperative and preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms in patients undergoing general anesthesia. In addition, many intraoperative ECG monitors have filters for removing electrocautery noise. In pediatric anesthesiology practice, we often note the appearance of elevated T waves—specifically, an increase in their height—with the use of such filters, even though no actual clinical change has occurred, which possibly leads to misdiagnosis. We investigated changes in R and T wave heights and in the T/R ratio according to the use of the strong (S) versus the diagnostic (D) filtering mode during pediatric anesthesiology. Primary outcomes were the dependence of the heights of the R and T waves on the filter mode and the correlation between rates of change in the R- and T-wave heights and heart rate (HR). In the S mode, the height of the R wave was lower (p = 0.013, η2 = 0.28) and the T/R ratio was higher than the corresponding values in the D mode (χ2 = 20.46, p < 0.001). The T/R ratios were also higher in the S mode than in the D mode, and when the D mode was changed to the S mode during tachycardia, there was a strong correlation between the rate of reduction in the R wave and HR (r = 0. 573, p = 0.041). Significant differences in the heights of the R wave and in the T/R ratio occur when using different intraoperative ECG filtering modes. Specifically, in S mode, a greater relative increase in T wave height may occur due to a significant decrease in R wave height. To avoid spurious diagnoses, anesthesiologists should be familiar with these potentially purely filter-driven changes whenever ECG is intraoperatively monitored.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference10 articles.

1. Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring. The American Society of Anesthesiologists 1–3 (2020). https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/standards-for-basic-anesthetic-monitoring. Accessed 7 Jan 2022.

2. Luo, S. & Johnston, P. A review of electrocardiogram filtering. J. Electrocardiol. 43, 486–496 (2010).

3. Parola, F. & Garcia-Niebla, J. Use of high-pass and low-pass electrocardiographic filters in an international cardiological community and possible clinical effects. AJVM 2, 34–38 (2017).

4. Gregg, R. E. et al. What is inside the electrocardiograph?. J. Electrocardiol. 41, 8–14 (2008).

5. Sharieff, G. Q. & Rao, S. O. The pediatric ECG. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 24, 195–208 (2006).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3