Author:
Witt Kelsey E.,Yarlagadda Karthik,Allen Julie M.,Bader Alyssa C.,Simon Mary L.,Kuehn Steven R.,Swanson Kelly S.,Cross Tzu-Wen L.,Hedman Kristin M.,Ambrose Stanley H.,Malhi Ripan S.
Abstract
AbstractPaleofeces or coprolites are often used to reconstruct diet at archaeological sites, usually using macroscopic analyses or targeted DNA amplification and sequencing. Here we present an integrative analysis of dog coprolites, combining macroscopic analyses, stable isotope measurements, and DNA shotgun sequencing to examine diet and health status. Dog coprolites used in this study were recovered from the Janey B. Goode and East Saint Louis archaeological sites, both of which are located in the American Bottom, an extensive Mississippi River floodplain in Southwestern Illinois. Based on the context of recovery, coprolites are assigned to the Late Woodland and Terminal Late Woodland periods (ca. 600–1050 AD). Given the scarcity of human remains from this time period, these dog coprolites can be useful as a proxy for understanding human diet during the Late Woodland period. We find that the Late Woodland dogs consumed a variety of fish as well as bird and plant taxa, possibly including maize, and also harbored intestinal parasites and pathogenic bacteria. By sequencing the fecal microbiome of the coprolites, we find some similarities to modern dog microbiomes, as well as specific taxa that can be used to discriminate between modern and ancient microbiomes, excluding soil contaminants. As dogs are often used as a surrogate to assess human diet, humans living with these dogs likely had a similar diet and were affected by similar parasites. These analyses, when integrated, show a more comprehensive view of ancient dog and human diet and health in the region during the initial expansion of maize agriculture than any individual method could alone.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference112 articles.
1. Reinhard, K. J. & Vaughn, B. Coprolite analysis: A biological perspective on archaeology. Archaeol. Method Theory 4, 245–288 (1992).
2. Horrocks, M., Irwin, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Nichol, S. L. & Williams, L. J. Pollen, phytoliths and diatoms in prehistoric coprolites from Kohika, Bay of Plenty. New Zeal. J. Archaeol. Sci. 30, 13–20 (2003).
3. Marcolino, C. P., dos Santos Isaias, R. M., Cozzuol, M. A., Cartelle, C. & Dantas, M. A. T. Diet of Palaeolama major (Camelidae) of Bahia, Brazil, inferred from coprolites. Quat. Int. 278, 81–86 (2012).
4. Toker, N. Y. et al. Preliminary results of the analysis of coprolite material of a dog unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe necropolis in eastern Anatolia. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 29, 759–765 (2005).
5. Fugassa, M. H. et al. Parasitism of prehistoric humans and companion animals from Antelope Cave, Mojave County, northwest Arizona. J. Parasitol. 97, 862–867 (2011).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献