Author:
Plank Irene Sophia,Hindi Attar Catherine,Kunas Stefanie L.,Dziobek Isabel,Bermpohl Felix
Abstract
AbstractEmpathy allows us to share emotions and encourages us to help others. It is especially important in the context of parenting where children’s wellbeing is dependent on their parents’ understanding and fulfilment of their needs. To date, little is known about differences in empathy responses of parents and non-parents. Using stimuli depicting adults and children in pain, this study focuses on the interaction of motherhood and neural responses in areas associated with empathy. Mothers showed higher activation to both adults and children in pain in the bilateral anterior insulae, key regions of empathy for pain. Additionally, mothers more strongly activated the inferior frontal, superior temporal and the medial superior frontal gyrus. Differences between adult and child stimuli were only found in occipital areas in both mothers and non-mothers. Our results suggest a stronger neural response to others in pain in mothers than non-mothers regardless of whether the person is a child or an adult. This could indicate a possible influence of motherhood on overall neural responses to others in pain rather than motherhood specifically shaping child-related responses. Alternatively, stronger responses to others in pain could increase the likelihood for women to be in a relationship and subsequently to have a child.
Funder
Claussen-Simon-Stiftung
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J. & Schoenrade, P. A. Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. J. Pers. 55, 19–39 (1987).
2. Kanske, P. The social mind: Disentangling affective and cognitive routes to understanding others. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 43, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2018.1453243 (2018).
3. de Vignemont, F. & Singer, T. The empathic brain: How, when and why?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 435–441 (2006).
4. Zahavi, D. & Overgaard, S. Empathy without Isomorphism: A phenomenological account. In Empathy: From Bench to Bedside (ed. Decety, J.) 3–20 (MIT Press, 2011).
5. Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F. M., Lesemann, F. H. P. & Singer, T. Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw052 (2016).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献